How many times before it’s Mathematically impossible and no longer coincidence?
One coincidence pertaining to the case, fine, but multiple? What does Q tell us the playbook is every time they need a big narrative shift to distract?
Now two coincidences.
What are the odds of Freemason logos and members showing up at the scene of numerous shootings? Kind of weird considering the lore and mystique surrounding the club? You would think the news reporters would see this pattern after a while and saying “gee maybe this isn’t the best look for anyone right now to show this logo at the crime scene…”
What are the odds they appear to communicate w similar groups on discord?
What are the odds as like I pointed out the theme of school day was FF footloose and fancy and encouraging “fun footwear” (double F twice / pumped up kicks)
What are the odds Sandy Hook had an active school shooting drill that same day across the state where many emt were far away at same time.
What are the odds 9/11 had actuall simulated jets being smashed into the towers to simulate a “terrorist attacker carried out on twin towers w passenger jets……..”
As terrorist attackers smashed passenger jets into the twin towers…..
Hundreds of people vs a handful with razors. Do you really think planes were flown into those buildings? Also, why did they fall into their own footprints? Why did Tower 7 fall?
But as with most things the “drill for terrorists jets” was actually a cover for the “attack made to look like terrorist jets” so the point still stands.
How would we “react” if planes hit the tower IE this is how we WILL ACT when we SAY planes hit the towers, because that is what it should LOOK LIKE.
Likely the drill is set in place as a marker, so anything suspicious leading up into the attack can be optically looked at through the eyes of the drill, untill it’s too late. A cover or plausible deniability of sorts perhaps. There is clearly something to the seemingly “random” drill always corresponding days or THE day of incident.
Just like they were “drilling for an active shooter” and then an “active shooter” pops up.
The drill never says anything about the active shooter being coached or perhaps even straight up helped/swapped out bodies with spooks and feds and mysterious other shooters which are always reported….
I agree, but as Q tells us, it’s simply math.
How many times before it’s Mathematically impossible and no longer coincidence?
One coincidence pertaining to the case, fine, but multiple? What does Q tell us the playbook is every time they need a big narrative shift to distract?
Now two coincidences.
What are the odds of Freemason logos and members showing up at the scene of numerous shootings? Kind of weird considering the lore and mystique surrounding the club? You would think the news reporters would see this pattern after a while and saying “gee maybe this isn’t the best look for anyone right now to show this logo at the crime scene…”
What are the odds they appear to communicate w similar groups on discord?
What are the odds as like I pointed out the theme of school day was FF footloose and fancy and encouraging “fun footwear” (double F twice / pumped up kicks)
What are the odds Sandy Hook had an active school shooting drill that same day across the state where many emt were far away at same time.
What are the odds 9/11 had actuall simulated jets being smashed into the towers to simulate a “terrorist attacker carried out on twin towers w passenger jets……..”
As terrorist attackers smashed passenger jets into the twin towers…..
Mathematically impossible?
Playbook known?
Knowingly?
Hundreds of people vs a handful with razors. Do you really think planes were flown into those buildings? Also, why did they fall into their own footprints? Why did Tower 7 fall?
All very true nothing makes sense.
But as with most things the “drill for terrorists jets” was actually a cover for the “attack made to look like terrorist jets” so the point still stands.
How would we “react” if planes hit the tower IE this is how we WILL ACT when we SAY planes hit the towers, because that is what it should LOOK LIKE.
Likely the drill is set in place as a marker, so anything suspicious leading up into the attack can be optically looked at through the eyes of the drill, untill it’s too late. A cover or plausible deniability of sorts perhaps. There is clearly something to the seemingly “random” drill always corresponding days or THE day of incident.
Just like they were “drilling for an active shooter” and then an “active shooter” pops up.
The drill never says anything about the active shooter being coached or perhaps even straight up helped/swapped out bodies with spooks and feds and mysterious other shooters which are always reported….
But those of us who know, know