Thank you for doing zero real research. For one, the Bible as we know it today was put together in a 1 book format at the council of Nicea. Roughly 325 AD. The letters (think NT) written were copied and distributed throughout the churches much earlier than that. Primarily, when the churches were first started, they were taught by the apostles themselves. So it would make sense that as they go from place to place, doing this whole new religion/ change of religion, from pre-Christ to post-Christ, they didn't have a huge committee deciding who goes where, who's fixing the agenda of the day, and who's writing the Bible. They were the very definition of grassroots. It started with 11 men and a few women, and from there exploded in numbers because of the witnesses. People chose to believe their own eyes and ears over drummed up stories from the Jewish leaders. No book was written post (roughly) 80AD when John had died, who wrote The Gospel according to John, 1,2,3 John, and Revelation.
Some how, there were thousands upon thousands of copies throughout the West (as compared to modern day eastern asia), that all said the exact same thing, verbatim. That is less believable to the atheist today than a single Roman document, that was never reproduced, and could easily have been faked, compared to the Bible, which had thousands of accounts of the same letters. I think I'll stick with the Bible.
The fact that the watching world / elites are muddying the truth of the history of the Bible should be a tell to anyone on this forum. Do you think politics is all the cabal is involved in? If you think so, let me borrow your watch so I can sell it back to you then.
Bible (New Testament)was written about 500 years after the fact.
Actually, some parts were written much earlier than that!
True, my point was only that its not the literal word of God.
As Michael mentioned, while missing my point and making it at the same time:
Wow, such insight, where'd you read that? NYT?
Thank you for doing zero real research. For one, the Bible as we know it today was put together in a 1 book format at the council of Nicea. Roughly 325 AD. The letters (think NT) written were copied and distributed throughout the churches much earlier than that. Primarily, when the churches were first started, they were taught by the apostles themselves. So it would make sense that as they go from place to place, doing this whole new religion/ change of religion, from pre-Christ to post-Christ, they didn't have a huge committee deciding who goes where, who's fixing the agenda of the day, and who's writing the Bible. They were the very definition of grassroots. It started with 11 men and a few women, and from there exploded in numbers because of the witnesses. People chose to believe their own eyes and ears over drummed up stories from the Jewish leaders. No book was written post (roughly) 80AD when John had died, who wrote The Gospel according to John, 1,2,3 John, and Revelation.
Some how, there were thousands upon thousands of copies throughout the West (as compared to modern day eastern asia), that all said the exact same thing, verbatim. That is less believable to the atheist today than a single Roman document, that was never reproduced, and could easily have been faked, compared to the Bible, which had thousands of accounts of the same letters. I think I'll stick with the Bible.
The fact that the watching world / elites are muddying the truth of the history of the Bible should be a tell to anyone on this forum. Do you think politics is all the cabal is involved in? If you think so, let me borrow your watch so I can sell it back to you then.