Narcolepsy is hitting hard, so I gotta hit and run.
Durham has a plan.
How do you introduce evidence legally?
He's going after the low-hanging fruit first.
You can't indict Hillary without evidence. You can't get evidence without discovery. You can't get discovery without evidence. That's the game the Court plays, and the primary method crooked Judges use to avoid hearing cases -- hiding behind standing and foundational evidence.
It's a common liberal tactic.
"You can't prove it!"
"HERE! Just read this! It's clear as day evidence that Hillary is guilty!"
"I'm not reading anything until you prove your claims!"
...
So, how do you get around this tactic?
Well, discovery of evidence is valid between courts. If one court finds the evidence credible in their discovery phase, it can transfer over to another court.
So, since we can't find a single honest court to hear evidence against Hillary, we must be like Iron man and introduce seemingly unrelated evidential facts before smaller courts. Then, once they are all laid out together, a greater Conspiracy Framework comes into focus.
Please watch until the end:
https://youtu.be/5Rb9hAHifFA?t=151
Durham is putting it together, in a cave... With only a box of scraps.
Each case is gonna seemingly fizzle out and go nowhere. But each one is going to present small matters of fact that allude to a more in-depth conspiracy, until the foundation is laid and all bricks point towards Hillary and Obama.
How do you build a home? Foundation to structure (layers).
Layers (U1, Iran, Human Traffic, Haiti, Corruption, etc etc).
Q already laid out the checklist.
One leads to the other, like stacking bricks.
First comes corruption in the election.
Which leads to Haiti and their blood harvesting.
Which leads to Human Trafficking worldwide.
Which leads to Iran and Alice in the Bloody Wonderland (Saudi Arabia)
Which leads to the U1 deal to frame Russia and spark WW3
Which leads to... "We're saving Israel for last"
Durham is only getting started.
That's bad news if you expected this to end soon.
If each case is about 2-3 weeks, we're looking at about 4-5 months.
Right in time for October.
The Hunt is On.
What really got me and I’m oh so glad he is, is how freakin cheap Sussman is! Believe me I have worked for some of the cheapest lawyers out there! Like most attorneys he’s programmed to make the “client” pay for all (expenses) disbursements, those usb drives. He had to present the receipt to his Accounts Payable dept. in order to be reimbursed for his monthly expenses, no receipt no reimbursement. So being the incredibly stupid and cheap attorney he is, he got a receipt and he placed the “clients number and matter number” on the receipt. The law firm then bills the “client” for the disbursement on the clients invoice using the client number and matter name, then the law firm sends the invoice off to the client for payment of the invoice including the disbursements for that month. I’d love to see the narratives on that invoice! It’s all on that invoice!
Of course, the law firm can destroy the initial “proforma” that had the original narratives, (attorney conversations with client what service they did) etc. along with the disbursements. However, the final invoice to the Client has to be kept intact in the law firms accounting records, they can’t delete it or they are in violation of accounting, IRS, insurance regulations etc. If an invoice needs to be presented for the courts they can redact it, but the disbursements have to show who and how it was billed and paid for, so all this led right back to Clinton.
Hard to believe any law office wouldn’t just have a box of new usb drives in their supply closet. That he actually walked to a Staples to buy one and saved the receipt to bill the client is absurd.
They do, however here is the catch firms are becoming increasingly tight that they don’t want attorneys and staff placing client information on usb drives. They don’t want the liability of a client’s information getting into the “wrong” hands, with confidential client documentation leaving the office and internal network. If you wanted to have client information files on a usb drive you would have to get IT department and executive committee approval. He bypassed that. So now he’s opened up the firm to lawsuits ... nice huh?