Narcolepsy is hitting hard, so I gotta hit and run.
Durham has a plan.
How do you introduce evidence legally?
He's going after the low-hanging fruit first.
You can't indict Hillary without evidence. You can't get evidence without discovery. You can't get discovery without evidence. That's the game the Court plays, and the primary method crooked Judges use to avoid hearing cases -- hiding behind standing and foundational evidence.
It's a common liberal tactic.
"You can't prove it!"
"HERE! Just read this! It's clear as day evidence that Hillary is guilty!"
"I'm not reading anything until you prove your claims!"
...
So, how do you get around this tactic?
Well, discovery of evidence is valid between courts. If one court finds the evidence credible in their discovery phase, it can transfer over to another court.
So, since we can't find a single honest court to hear evidence against Hillary, we must be like Iron man and introduce seemingly unrelated evidential facts before smaller courts. Then, once they are all laid out together, a greater Conspiracy Framework comes into focus.
Please watch until the end:
https://youtu.be/5Rb9hAHifFA?t=151
Durham is putting it together, in a cave... With only a box of scraps.
Each case is gonna seemingly fizzle out and go nowhere. But each one is going to present small matters of fact that allude to a more in-depth conspiracy, until the foundation is laid and all bricks point towards Hillary and Obama.
How do you build a home? Foundation to structure (layers).
Layers (U1, Iran, Human Traffic, Haiti, Corruption, etc etc).
Q already laid out the checklist.
One leads to the other, like stacking bricks.
First comes corruption in the election.
Which leads to Haiti and their blood harvesting.
Which leads to Human Trafficking worldwide.
Which leads to Iran and Alice in the Bloody Wonderland (Saudi Arabia)
Which leads to the U1 deal to frame Russia and spark WW3
Which leads to... "We're saving Israel for last"
Durham is only getting started.
That's bad news if you expected this to end soon.
If each case is about 2-3 weeks, we're looking at about 4-5 months.
Right in time for October.
The Hunt is On.
If Durham is going for RICO, it won't be to prosecute these people. It will be to prosecute the higher-ups. And the in-court open testimony of these individuals will be part of the basis for those charges of other people.
No double jeopardy.
This is not Durham's first rodeo.
Your point about Garland is important. If Durham is really going after these higher-up criminals, then why is Garland allowing it? Why is he even allowing this case to go to trial?
The trillion dollar question right there. I have no idea. The best I have is wild speculation. And this "theory" has a lot of holes in it. Perhaps you could fill them in where I have been unable.
One thing abundantly obvious at this point is that the Clintons and Obamas don't get along. A variety of things illustrate this. One of the key unique traits that I noticed very early on in the Obama admin was that Obama has to be the boss. His ego is so huge he cannot share power with anyone. While this in itself is not unique, what is unique about this in modern American politics is Obama's purge of what he views as potential rivals to his authority. No matter the stretch, Obama wants loyal apparatchiks at any cost - including competency.
I believe Andrew Cuomo was an Obama purge. He was/is a potential rival to control of the DNC. And he is a Clintonista, not Obama loyalist. As such, they protected and promoted the insane and incompetent imbecile De Blasio over the far more competent Cuomo.
I'm not sure what the general consensus around here is re: Biden, but it is important to remember that Biden is not really an Obama guy. We have seen evidence that Obama was very embarrassed by his gaffs. He doesn't seem to care if it becomes public knowledge. Biden served 2 functions when he became VP pick in 2008: (1) bridge the enormous divide between the Clinton and Obama factions from the bitter primary; and (2) add foreign policy street cred to the Obama campaign - which is what John Kerry blamed for his loss to Bush and was the chief criticism of the inexperienced Obama. Now Biden has been wrong on literally every foreign policy issue to ever exist. But he is "experienced" in this regard. Biden is a Clintonista. It is not of consequence he served in the Obama admin. That was a compromise, nothing more.
This has led me down the road of thinking that it was actually Obama who sabotaged Clinton's election. For reasons that Obama would be rendered second or third fiddle to a standing Clinton presidency. She would control the DNC at this point. He couldn't have that; he would be sailing away into irrelevance.
My thoughts are that Obama, who ALWAYS bites off more than he can chew, somehow undermined the Clinton election by preventing the full implementation of fraud. Be it machine fraud, insufficient ballot stuffing, or whatever the case may be. And we know he told Hillary to immediately concede and not contest this.
Then Obama, being the over-estimator-in-chief of his own abilities, likely thought that Trump would be an easy takedown with this Russia Collusion hoax. They'd simply undermine him from within, dispose of him quickly, and he'd get to pick his preferred candidate in 2020 while rendering the Clintons obsolete. This obviously failed miserably. As a desperation Hail Mary, they rig the primary against Bernie and stick Biden in for lack of another option that Obama can control - Kamala failed to gain any traction. The benefit of Biden is that he's also senile; which adds a level of cover to the sabotage of the country. It looks less like malfeasance and more like just an idiot. And unlikely to have a blast radius carrying over to other Democrats - so they thought at the time.
Now we have a battle between rival factions playing out. Biden knows that if he does not maintain power, Obama WILL purge him, his family, and his son. Which is why I contend the US Attorney's office in Delaware has a case open against Hunter. Also, the Clintons know that if Obama boots Biden, he will purge them too. So they have to prop up Biden. But the special counsel is targeting Clinton. Obama can't get rid of the SC because that would remove his leverage over Clinton. And restore Clinton to viability within the party for control.
Evidence of the Clintons propping up Biden: Assigning Kamala to border duty, and the continued ridiculing of her to lower her favorability rating. If Hillary had her way, she'd drive Kamala out of office. And since she's got 0 interest in losing a third election, she wants a sure thing - nomination to the office of Vice President. Which she would then immediately 25th Biden and become president without ever having won a single vote.
This obviously has holes in it. But is the best theory I could come up with. Would be interested in your thoughts/hole fill-ins.
I would say that my view is maybe a little higher elevation. I don't focus so much on the individual puppets (and I think they are all puppets).
Re: Obama --
I believe he is a CIA asset, and has been from his earliest years. This is why he has no identifiable history, including no birth certificate, and nobody who can remember him at the schools he supposedly attended.
Both of his maternal grandparents were CIA. His grandmother was a VP at the Bank of Hawaii, which laundered money to various Asian governments at that time.
His mother was also CIA. Her role eventually became to use her communist ideological roots to help her new husband Soetoro in Indonesia. He was a high-ranking military officer, who helped in the round-up and murder of communist revolutionaries in Indonesia. She worked for the Ford Foundation, a CIA front, and infiltrated that group, to identify who to take out. The CIA was installing a puppet regime, and they were getting rid of the commies because the commies were backed by the USSR.
This was a run-up to the Vietnam War.
Re: Clinton --
Hillary comes from a mob family, according to Larry Nichols, who was an Arkansas State trooper, and eventually became a personal guard of Gov. Clinton. He had a lot of stories to tell.
Hillary was always extermely ambitious, and without a moral compass. She was so nasty, that she was kicked off the legal team that was investigating Watergate. She was too corrupt, even for that team of attorneys.
Bill Clinton became a "made man" via Carroll Quigley, a professor of his at Georgetown University. Quigley was invited into the inner sanctum of the globalist planners, in order to study their history. It was a private project they commissioned. The current (at the time) players in that criminal group wanted to go through a ton of documents that had been collected by their predecessors, and have it all sorted out for them. Quigley was hired to do that. He eventually wrote and had published two books about his findings. One of those books was immediately removed from publication, but that only created more interest (the Streisand Effect), so it went back into publication.
This is why Clinton became a Rhodes scholar, which is one of the means by which they identify potential young individuals to groom through the corrupt system.
Hillary was always riding Bill's coattails. Having psychopathic ambition, she resented that. Yet, she was able to execise a lot of power from the shadows. What with all the Arkancides that happened, the Whitewater theft, and the various schemes and crimes they got away with over the years, she likely becamse convinced that she was more important, more valuable, and smarter than she really ever was.
It was her "turn" at the presidency. She knew 2016 was rigged for her benefit -- both the primary and the general.
This is why her reactions were so bizarre when she lost. She "just knew" that the vote was "wrong."
I agree that there is a rift or battle between Obama and Clinton. Clinton also knows that Obama was not a natural born citizen. She was the one who came out with it first. She has that to hold over him.
However, he was also using her private server while she was Secretary of State. They have become joined at the hip in their co-criminal actions. Neither can afford to really destroy the other, yet they both want the power and the fame, so they do battle.
But I believe that they are just two factions among several factions of the bigger picture, which is run by a globalist group of criminals, who are the real brains behind it all.
Even they, individually, are not all that brilliant. But when you have billions of dollars to fund various think tanks, researchers, bioweapons labs, etc., someone in that system will eventually come up with something that can be used as a plan. They think long-term, and they don't really give a damn about the puppets, other than making sure they stay controlled.
Since they control the media, and the media largely influences the sheep, they have been able to push their agenda to a large degree. But they know there will always be resistance, so they need useful idiots like Obama, Clinton, Bush, and all the rest to lead various factions, so that they can direct things where they want it to go.
If I am right, then Q, Trump, Durham, and many more know all of this and a lot more. Durham is going after small fry right now. Is that going to be the end of it, or is it going to lead to the bigger puppets, and eventually a take-down of the corrupt system itself?
I dunno ...
I seem to remember some fbi documents that came to light a few years ago that would support some of your thoughts here. I believe obama was working with the fbi to set hillary up over the illegal server so that after her stint at president, she would be coerced to help michelle get elected. I dont have the sauce handy, and maybe I am remembering it wrong, but if you are looking for more evidence to your theory this maybe a direction to search.
It sure seems like these Intel and federal law enforcement agencies are attempting to seize control of the government this way. Would be interested in whatever you can provide. Thank you!
https://www.independentsentinel.com/texts-strongly-suggest-obama-kept-tabs-on-hillary-email-scandal/
I still cant find the article discussing documents that showed the plan was to coerce hillary into helping michelle after her run, but they were clearly keeping tabs on her.