What was the full title of Charles Darwin's "origin of species" ?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (46)
sorted by:
Ah .... : your cup of tea. The discarded intelligent design blabla.
idiot = person so mentally deficient as to be incapable of ordinary reasoning;
I do grant you, the word ordinary is quite strategic here. It depends on what one would consider ordinary. I am sure, Giordano Bruno was not very revered when he published his conclusion that a heliocentric worldview would rather fit the observed phenomena. Tycho Brahe had the fortune of being quite well set. Tycho was wrong Giordano was right. Giordano died because of heresy, Tycho died because of bachus.
Yet both man had good reasons to produce their models and they were very close. Tycho was closer than Giordano. Keppler turned it upside down by using elliptical courses instead of circular and Newton showed why these planetary courses were elliptical rather than circular. It took 2 to 400 years to bridge that.
If anything, when it comes to these kind of things, you are showing a remarkable closed mindedness precluding you from making a rational argument, that in other areas of inquiry is quite present. I often find myself agreeing with you, but then again, on this subject, I have to burst your bubble once again.
Resorting to name calling is not your best argument. In fact, it is your worst performance as it is not an argument but a judgement and a derogatory one at that.
With this out of the way, you wrote:
An idiot would agree with you. A wise man would ask himself: what is the time-frame between a musket and an AR-15 and who is this designer?
The answer along the lines of your simplicity touted as rational argument is: an intelligent designer.
The musket itself knows a development or evolution of 300 years before being retired for other types of rifles. The AR-15 is a scaled down version of the AR-10 of 1959. At the very least, based on these conditions, your claim is falsified:
as more than one intelligent designer worked on "rifle development" over the course of 600 years, and the looks and characteristics of rifles vary over this course of time, and we know their names.
Another simple distinction you appear to fail to take into account is the difference between animate and inanimate objects. The latter cannot procreate by itself, but is in dire need of copy paste or better said: cloning when wood rot and rust have taken their toll.
Yet, it is subject to death, to hunger (no powder and shot) too much rain making it a perfect club.
animate objects are different. Procreation is an art. And in our case, as souls in a body, we get to experience such dance of life. However, if your closed mindedness makes it highly likely you get to mate and produce offspring by a mate, then logic dictates you will do so. And you will be teaching your children your closed mindedness is the way to go.
Looking down on people with a different mind than yours, calling them idiots, is equal to what Giordano Bruno experienced. Maybe, once you stood at that fire in campo di fiore and cheered for his demise. And now, you resort only to name-calling. Quite an evolution.
Looking outside of your enclosure is dangerous.
...Bad soil. We're done here.