This one is a massive boom for not simply the US, but the Whole World. The Davos clique are NOT getting their way.
Oh, and in case they forgot: Nothing Can Stop What is Coming!
Source article: One Nation (freedom-oriented political party in Australia) publication. Date May 30, 2022
See part of the text below:
Source: https://www.onenation.org.au/who-forced-into-humiliating-backdown
Brilliant news out of Geneva today!
As most of you know, the World Health Assembly has spent the past 7 days considering Biden’s 13 controversial amendments to the International Health Regulations.
Official delegates from wealthy developed nations like Australia, the UK, and the US spoke in strong support of the amendments and urged other states to join them in signing away their countries’ sovereignty.
The first sign, however, that things might not be going the globalists' way, came on Wednesday, the 25th of May, which just happened to also be Africa Day.
Botswana read a statement on behalf of its 47 AFRO members, saying they would be collectively withholding their support for the ‘reforms’, which many African members were very concerned about.
Multiple other countries also said they had reservations over the changes and would not be supporting them either.
These included Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, Iran and Malaysia. Brazil in particular said it would exit WHO altogether, rather than allow its population to be made subject to the new amendments.
In the end, the WHO and its wealthy nation supporters were forced to back down.
They have not given up though – far from it. Instead, they did what they always do and 'pivoted'.
At their request, a new working group was convened to make "technical recommendations on the proposed amendments" which will be re-submitted along with the Pandemic Treaty, at the 77th Health Assembly meeting in 2024.
There has also been lots of pushback from Republicans in the US, with a number of them introducing new bills giving the US Congress/Senate powers to override any WHO mandates or directives issued as part of any international agreements.
One, called the 'No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act' has 15 co-sponsors and was introduced to the Senate on Thursday by Republican Senator Ron Johnson, who said "The sovereignty of the United States is not negotiable".
(See full text at source link)
Edit: WHO proposed Amendments, as proposed by Sleepy Joe's puppet masters.
https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_18-en.pdf
(Kudos to u/crashdaddy for the digs)
I'm going to be in the minority here, but from the beginning I have always thought this was click bait type of garbage. Not that I do not believe their intent to act as tyrants. But this appears to be a larp designed to drive fund raising. And maybe even try to convince people they must vote for RINOs to stop muh scary WHO takeover. Even a distraction from other things we should focus attention on.
No treaty trumps the Constitution. This has been reinforced multiple times over the centuries in case law. Before people say "but most of what Congress does is unconstitutional and it happens anyways..." stop and consider how much more straight forward this is compared to the commerce clause. If they did actually try this, outside of the left and right communist coasts, nobody is going to listen to it. People will just thumb their noses at such bs. And I bet over half of the commie coasts resist this too.
If you were going to attempt to use a treaty as an end around the Constitution (which doesn't work) then is this where a non brain dead tyrant would start? Hell no. Anyone remotely higher than room temperature IQ is going to make a treaty banning guns. Because that is far more important to them than some kind of lockdown power. Why go through this false flag garbage when you could just sign a treaty? Yet we aren't seeing that.
So yes, its a frightening concept that there would be a surrender of sovereignty to an international corrupt organization. But it just doesn't make any sense that they'd try this particular angle first.
They are not trying to usurp the Constitution with this. The Constitution doesn't mention health issues. They are trying to use treaties to usurp the power of the States, who have power over health laws.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Is this StaticInTheAttic?