The Sussman single, low level charge was and is an interesting opening gambit. Yes, we will have to endure fake news on how this blows the Durham investigation up. But they will never admit this trial was used to introduce the reality of the conspiracy into an official record. And, the distinct possibility this charge and trial was more about that, than wanting/needing a conviction.
Had he been convicted the FBI would be having a party. It would have given them plausible deniability. The conspiracy would be resting squarely on Hillary’s and the DNC’s shoulders. His acquittal implies the opposite, they knew who he represented and chose to engage in the conspiracy.
Interestingly, even if Sussman did not lie to the FBI, he still participated in a conspiracy to influence the 2016 Presidential election. Will he be charged with that in the future? Or, has he possibly already cut a deal on the more serious charges?
Thanks to u/MeanOMan for opening my mind to this perspective!
As always, only time will tell.
Another point:
The corruption and degradation of the US court institutions needs to be brought out and exposed, because to actually convict the criminal conspirators, unrigged, uncompromised venues need to be established, and that can only happen via exposure of the system.
DJT truth:
"Our Legal System is CORRUPT, our Judges (and Justices) are highly partisan, compromised or just plain scared.... "
Who on earth really cares is sussman does time for a lie to the FBI? I really wondered, what the heck is Durham doing with .... "He lied to the FBI" charge? It's like charging someone in the United California Bank Heist ($30million) with shoplifting, or giving them a $25 fine for Jaywalking over to the bank.
But now I get it. 5D chess. Makes total sense.
And, the unthinking Swamp will be celebrating tonight, while the thinking ones are sh*tting their pants.
Yes, this plays into my thoughts as well...
theory: Durham's role is to awaken the masses to the need for Military tribunals.
aha. I never considered that one.
That would be fricken awesome.
Because that is going to be a big call. Gonna be really hard to get the majority of the US population to see and accept that actual, deadly treason is every bit as fricken real (if not more real) in 2000's as it was in 1776, or 1812, or 1850's.
Either way, if one thinks that what Durham is doing is NOT strategic, then that's a really dumb conclusion. I'll admit, I fell into it for a few hours today, but it's ludicrous when you consider all the real facts.
Unless of course Durham has been holidaying in Bermuda 327 days of the year for the past 5 years, and has been billing it all to the US government somehow. But I think that's not very likely. Kek.
we all fall into that.. the mental gymnastics we have wade through daily is insane..
keep your head up, eyes open, don't get too tied to theories, but don't be afraid to share them either...