ELA analysis of this picture looks to good to be photoshopped.
In images that are edited Error Level Analysis can detect even the slightest differences in jpg compression ratios in pictures. If this was photoshopped there would be significant white marks in the ELA version.
This was probably taken at a high (f16 or higher) aperture for the clarity of the background, a lower shutter speed which causes the slight blur of moving objects and then tone mapped by a complete dolt. The guy in front of Durham is over tone mapped. His hands and face gives it away.
So technically this photo is edited (poorly), but all of the elements were in the frame when it was taken.
Pretty much my thoughts exactly. I might even go a step further and propose this is a picture taken on a phone with automatic tone mapping. That would also explain the deep focus (caused by the small sensor).
ELA analysis of this picture looks to good to be photoshopped.
In images that are edited Error Level Analysis can detect even the slightest differences in jpg compression ratios in pictures. If this was photoshopped there would be significant white marks in the ELA version.
This was probably taken at a high (f16 or higher) aperture for the clarity of the background, a lower shutter speed which causes the slight blur of moving objects and then tone mapped by a complete dolt. The guy in front of Durham is over tone mapped. His hands and face gives it away.
So technically this photo is edited (poorly), but all of the elements were in the frame when it was taken.
Pretty much my thoughts exactly. I might even go a step further and propose this is a picture taken on a phone with automatic tone mapping. That would also explain the deep focus (caused by the small sensor).