So, for many years, despite being totally red pilled on pizza gate and a million other things, I still thought the chemtrails theory was suspect (like flat earth is suspect). I felt that the explanation was reasonable that at certain altitudes, temperatures, and humidity levels, contrails could linger for extended periods of time. But, about 3 months ago, instead of a few lingering contrails here and there, it's ramped up to dozens of them almost every single day. After these days, the evening and overnight winds are insane. We've had insane winds most days for MONTHS. Never experienced anything like it in my life, completely ridiculous to pretend it's a natural weather pattern for the region I live in.
So, coinciding with the dramatically increased and regular "lingering contrails", I thought to myself 'I guess I should look into this chemtrail thing a bit.' So, I watched the documentary "What In The World Are They Spraying?" and they presented evidence about astronomically high levels of aluminum in the soil in places where they do this spraying, which causes the PH of the soil to come way up, so I decided to test the soil in my own back yard. Predictably, its PH is WAY high at 7.9. At 7 a lot of plants can't survive have trouble.
Anyway, I'm now thoroughly convinced they're spraying something for some reason, and obviously not a good one. So, I've been paying more attention to what days they spray, and if I could spot a pattern. I've logged in to flight trackers to try and figure out which planes, and I've searched on the internet trying to find others who have already spent years trying to spot the patterns of these flights... But I couldn't find much. There are several websites with a LOT of surface information, but apparently no one has simply logged the days, amount of passes across their airspace, the flight numbers and callsigns (or lack thereof) of the aircraft, and compared these datasets to possible explanations. If any of you know of a place where such data is compiled or presented, I'd love to see it.
Now then, I've hit upon one data point in a possible pattern: after months of total sky covering spraying almost every day, there was no spraying at all across the entire Memorial Day weekend. There are plenty of standard passenger flights across this weekend, the sky was full of planes like it is any other day- but no lingering contrails. Not a single one. Do we ever see lingering contrails spreading across the sky on federal holidays? If not, that's quite a damning coincidence. If we could demonstrate a pattern like that, we could easily shut down the "lingering contrail due to common atmospheric conditions" argument- does the weather take federal holidays off?
I didn't call you a liar, I said what you've said is a lie. You might be the victim of the lie rather than a perpetrator.
Nah, I can support them just fine, and have. Your claims are what cannot be supported.
Your career is irrelevant. There are 40 year practicing doctors who have administered hundreds of thousands of doses of vaccines, causing untold negative effects for virtually no upside, certain the entire time that they were doing what was best for their patients.
I did not say I know better, I said there are people better credentialed than you who know better. Amazing that no matter what is said you can't respond to it honestly.
You have NO proof. You only have your worthless authority.
You are not willing to share or educate, or that's what you would do. You seem only willing to deride, seeing as that's all you've done.
I have not condescended to you unprovoked, you started it.
You've made no points that I have not addressed, you gaslighting shill. Go test your soil and the air for aluminum. Go fly through the clouds left by the unmarked planes every single day, which show up on no open source flight trackers, and prove they aren't spraying aluminum. Until you do that, your standard of proof for your position is ZERO compared to the standard of proof being brought by the chemtrail alarmists.
I have to prove that something isn't happening? No, that's not where the burden of proof lies. I don't have to prove there are no unicorns. It is on you to prove that there are unicorns. And proof requires evidence, not speculative arguments and unsubstantiated correlations.
Don't worry about credentials. I have them. You don't have them (or you would surely have mentioned them) and you don't even name your sources and their "credentials." You are not in a position to be judicious about sources. Check out patent no. 7,686,253 for evidence that I know my stuff (you get to guess which contributor I was).
I have been providing information---such as the fact that there is aluminum naturally present from all kinds of sources. It's one of the first things you find out by doing a few seconds of research. No evidence that it is coming from any "spraying." No. I don't have to disprove your paranoid fantasy. You have to prove it. And you can't, within the scientific method.
No, you have to prove that the proof presented is false, you dildo. The chemtrail alarmists have already fulfilled their burden of proof.
I name nothing because you are a shill unworthy of earnest discussion. You go find the evidence for yourself, find the best evidence you can that you are wrong, and disprove it, then we can talk on equal footing. Until then, your appeal to your own authority is a joke.
You have provided NOTHING. Your "fact" that aluminum is present naturally in many forms is GASLIGHTING. Yeah, aluminum is everywhere- bound up in more complex molecules. Free aluminum has never been in the rain in the history of the planet, at least in any more than unmeasurably small amounts. Same for the soil. That's something you would find out with a few seconds of research. And notice, AGAIN, that you simply CAN NOT answer to what I actually said, you MUST make up something I DIDN'T say to argue against.
The evidence it comes from spraying comes from atmospheric sampling by aircraft flying through the supposed chemtrails themselves.
My paranoid fantasy is already proven, with the scientific method, it is up to you to demonstrate that the proof is flawed. And simply saying so repeatedly is laughably insufficient. You are a complete LOSER for arguing with me with such dishonesty instead of going and confronting the proof for yourself. You do your credentials enormous insult by acting this way.
What proof? All you do is assert. You provide no details. When you allude to any specifics (aluminum in soil) you demonstrate ignorance of the fact that the specific is a commonplace. There is no "free aluminum." The nature of its chemistry is that it will immediately oxidize on exposure to air or water. (Put naked aluminum in water and it will react exothermically.) Plenty of alumninosilicate compounds, however.
What aircraft sampling? What you are claiming would be against air safety requirements. How about flight plans and aircraft tail numbers? Or would that be too incriminating? (Getting that close to another airplane is an inherently dangerous maneuver...said the expert that worked on the KC-46 tanker.) And how would you know you are sampling a spray and not engine exhaust? How would you know there was even a spray? I've seen the hoax photos of a "chemtrail-equipped airliner," which was really a developmental model equipped with a water ballast management system for center-of-gravity location studies. You see, I worked in this industry. There is nothing like that going on.
All this talk and you still haven't explained why (or if) there is a visual difference between contrails and "chemtrails." Reference to persistence is useless, in that contrails can persist not at all or can extend from horizon to horizon for a long time, slowly diffusing. I've seen them. Prove I haven't.
There are legitimate and open cloud-seeding programs in states like California, Nevada, and Colorado. The seeding areas are delimited and the program schedules are available. The aircraft are not airliners. I assume you are not talking about this non-secret activity. There are also emergency situations where civil or military aircraft must dump fuel for safety purposes prior to an emergency landing. I assume you are not talking about these events either (are you aware of them?). And, of course, there is extinguishant dumping in the fighting of forest fires. I assume you are not talking about that.
And, most interesting to me, you are not talking about the visibly evident and copious chemtrails inherent in launch vehicles using large solid boosters. Plenty of aluminum oxide and hydrochloric acid produced by these boosters...but you don't concern yourself. I wonder why. Could it be that such a cause would not further your paranoid fantasy? But why not? It is all government-supported. NASA has a big hand in it. It should ring the right bells. Nope. The real chemtrails are not for you.
I'm not the source of the proof, and I do not respect your intellectual honesty enough to provide you what I believe is proof. You need to stop being a baby and go find it yourself.
No, I don't. When you respond to those claims, you distort them into something that wasn't said in order to make me wrong. You are a dishonest person.
You are an idiot. Aluminosilicates are how aluminum is normally found in nature. Aluminum oxide is NOT.
You can figure that out for yourself if you go actually look.
And yet they managed to get it done. The explanation of how is very obvious, you'll see, if you go look for yourself instead of being a moron.
Good luck getting a tail number off an unmarked plane at 35,000 feet, which doesn't show up on public flight trackers.
Why would they need to get anywhere near a plane with a contrail lingering hundreds of miles behind it?
You're a moron, lol. You know that the scientific field of chemistry exists, right?
Irrelevant. That some people got something wrong somewhere does not affect the real proof at all.
You're unfortunately incorrect.
You have not asked me to explain that, and if you had I'd tell you it's irrelevant. They can look identical, it doesn't matter. The proof has nothing to do with how they look, it is their composition.
I already said earlier that I believe that contrails CAN linger for a long time, and spread. But, the outrageous increase I saw where I live in such contrails was simply ridiculous to behold, and so clearly not natural I had no option but to reassess whether chemtrail spraying was a real thing. I looked into it, and found the proof that the various researchers had compiled was solid.
Correct, this is obviously not cloud seeding, and the planes doing it are untracked (which is illegal for civilian planes).
So, you're saying they filled the entire sky from horizon to horizon, almost every day for three months, with emergency fuel dumps? So like, several thousand emergency landings happening over my head? Oh, but some of it may be forest fires being put out, all zero of them this season. So, we've got hundreds and hundreds of phantom emergency landings and phantom forest fires being put out. That explains it!
Oh, well now THAT explains it, these conventional winged aircraft we see in the sky leaving dozens of lingering contrails that blanket the entire sky every day are actually solid booster space launch vehicles! In disguise! It all makes sense now.
Oh yes, a few rocket launches here and there are totally the cause of total sky enveloping contrails across basically the entire nation, totally the cause of increased aluminum in the air, rain, and soil. Not the dozens of unmarked, untracked aircraft we can see with our own eyes literally spraying stuff into the air every day.
I hope you realize how dumb you sound, but I suspect you won't.