Ok, thanks for the info. Let me ask you a question then. Why do you think Durham, a prosecutor who has never lost a case (from what I’ve heard) would choose to prosecute Sussman in DC with a presiding judge that has a professional relationship with Sussman, the judges wife was Lisa Page’s lawyer, one of the jury members kids is a rowing mate with Sussman’s kid, and several of the jury members were Clinton supporters and donors without asking for the judges recusal or challenging the questionable jurors? It’s almost like he intentionally wanted to lose the case.
Yes. Lawfag here.
Ok, thanks for the info. Let me ask you a question then. Why do you think Durham, a prosecutor who has never lost a case (from what I’ve heard) would choose to prosecute Sussman in DC with a presiding judge that has a professional relationship with Sussman, the judges wife was Lisa Page’s lawyer, one of the jury members kids is a rowing mate with Sussman’s kid, and several of the jury members were Clinton supporters and donors without asking for the judges recusal or challenging the questionable jurors? It’s almost like he intentionally wanted to lose the case.