These two articles were written hours apart on the same day, about the same state, by the same journalist....
You can’t make it up.
(media.greatawakening.win)
📺 MEDIA STUPIDITY
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (42)
sorted by:
I see I'm conversing with a moron. Reading comprehension is preferable when on a forum....kind of important.
Had you stopped a moment instead of ranting like a leftist and thought about what you just said, you'd understand why I'm saying this now.
Example:
What, a Theorist or "Right"? Your literary skills aren't exactly coherent so I'll address both. First, I literally said I wasn't a theorist, but AM a factualist. I don't present bullshit Theories that do not have provable data behind it. Second, as for being "right", well, I am, so let's just play this out to prove it.
To Wit: since you couldnt be bothered to look up the definition of a Theory to prove yourself wrong as I had suggested, here it is for you from Websters.
"Plausible", "belief", "Ideal or Hypothetical", "unproved assumption", "Conjecture" are all things defining what a Theory is; i.e. a WAG.
In layman terms, Corky, a better understanding of what you spout off would go a long way to looking less ignorant. You can pull that BS on Fakebook or Twatter, but not here.
Contextually and definitively different in every way.
An established Theory; e.g. Big Bang Theory that is wrongfully taught as fact, and pondering possibilities without affirming it's plausibility as fact are not the same. I do not expect someone whose mental capacity is on par with a Golden Retriever to understand that, but I felt a glimmer of hope in offering the explanation to you anyway. Either it'll sink in or you'll begin dragging your ass on the carpet. My money is on the latter.
Edit: I've scored between 148 and 152 on several IQ tests, by request. So technically, yes, that does make me a Genius according to MENSA rules of the required 140 to qualify. You know, since you brought it up.
No, I simply preferred another label than the one you "proudly" wear and gave clear examples as to why . You attacked me for it. Thus now engaged, I corrected your lack of self awareness on the fallacy of being prideful over a derogatory term used by Government to quell those asking important questions. Perhaps read and analyze your own comments to see how we got here, if that's within your ability to deconstruct.
No science required.
Edit: Frankly this is boring. Trying to explain logic to you is like asking a Golden Retriever to solve for X. Impossible, hence the reference. Bark away, I'm done.