That's actually the first thing that occurred to me. I read "whistleblower" and felt a little twinge of confusion seeing the dot gov. I need some kind of message about the origins and motivation of this disclosure, over and above the insightful speculation in this thread. I'll read and share this, but I agree with you all that this is a major WOW.
The National Institute of Health is turning on the Center for Disease Control. Well if that doesn't make a few more start scratching their heads, I'll eat my hat or something...
Yep, after I read the piece, it's clear that 'whistleblower' doesn't quite fit. What's it called when one government organization chucks another one under the bus?
That's actually the first thing that occurred to me. I read "whistleblower" and felt a little twinge of confusion seeing the dot gov. I need some kind of message about the origins and motivation of this disclosure, over and above the insightful speculation in this thread. I'll read and share this, but I agree with you all that this is a major WOW. The National Institute of Health is turning on the Center for Disease Control. Well if that doesn't make a few more start scratching their heads, I'll eat my hat or something...
There is nothing to be confused about. He is not a whistleblower. Just another mis-titled link.
It's a good read though. Maybe mis-titled articles are our version of misspellings?
Yep, after I read the piece, it's clear that 'whistleblower' doesn't quite fit. What's it called when one government organization chucks another one under the bus?
Government cannibalism?