That's actually the first thing that occurred to me. I read "whistleblower" and felt a little twinge of confusion seeing the dot gov. I need some kind of message about the origins and motivation of this disclosure, over and above the insightful speculation in this thread. I'll read and share this, but I agree with you all that this is a major WOW.
The National Institute of Health is turning on the Center for Disease Control. Well if that doesn't make a few more start scratching their heads, I'll eat my hat or something...
Yep, after I read the piece, it's clear that 'whistleblower' doesn't quite fit. What's it called when one government organization chucks another one under the bus?
The title is misleading. Dr Blaylock is not a whistleblower but is a neurosurgeon that has been doing research for years on the toxic effects of vaxxines and other neuro-excitotoxins. His book, Excitotoxins - The Taste That Kills, is excellent. I have been following the work of Dr Blaylock for several decades. He came on to my radar when he was still in clinical practice. The industry and media could not discredit his work - they just simply ignored it. Therefore, only those of us that were close to this topic knew about him or his research.
This NIH paper is not a study but a well written analysis with conclusions that are supported by other documentation.
I don't know how much a whistleblower he is being on a dot gov website. If anything it should be triggering Spidey senses for wtf are they doing now!?
That's actually the first thing that occurred to me. I read "whistleblower" and felt a little twinge of confusion seeing the dot gov. I need some kind of message about the origins and motivation of this disclosure, over and above the insightful speculation in this thread. I'll read and share this, but I agree with you all that this is a major WOW. The National Institute of Health is turning on the Center for Disease Control. Well if that doesn't make a few more start scratching their heads, I'll eat my hat or something...
There is nothing to be confused about. He is not a whistleblower. Just another mis-titled link.
It's a good read though. Maybe mis-titled articles are our version of misspellings?
Yep, after I read the piece, it's clear that 'whistleblower' doesn't quite fit. What's it called when one government organization chucks another one under the bus?
Government cannibalism?
The title is misleading. Dr Blaylock is not a whistleblower but is a neurosurgeon that has been doing research for years on the toxic effects of vaxxines and other neuro-excitotoxins. His book, Excitotoxins - The Taste That Kills, is excellent. I have been following the work of Dr Blaylock for several decades. He came on to my radar when he was still in clinical practice. The industry and media could not discredit his work - they just simply ignored it. Therefore, only those of us that were close to this topic knew about him or his research.
This NIH paper is not a study but a well written analysis with conclusions that are supported by other documentation.
He is one of the very few MDs that I greatly respect.
For sure.