The duplicates aren't "potential" but confirmed and that alone was enough to swing the state. Apparently a number of the findings had to be redacted from the report for some reason. Not sure why, seems kind of suspect.
I don't usually say this about zerohedge but I do appreciate that they provided the official rebuttals to claims made, almost like a fact-check.
As for the duplicates,
Of the 1,929,242 return envelopes provided by the Senate, 17,322 duplicates were found, with some voters having cast the same ballot three to four times, according to Ayyadurai’s report (pdf). He noted that Maricopa county’s canvass report, meanwhile, did not report any duplicates.
In response to duplicated ballot allegations, Maricopa County wrote Friday, “Re: duplicated ballots. Every time a voter has a questioned signature or a blank envelope, we work with that voter to cure the signature. That’s our staff doing their job to contact voters with questioned signatures or blank ballots. Only one ballot is counted.”
You can choose not to believe them, but zerohedge accepted it without contradicting the claim.
Not going to try to change your mind but that doesn't sound like an argument in good faith. If you challenge something, they provide a rationale and you say "well I don't care because I don't trust you to begin with so I'm going to ignore that", then are you really seeking the truth, or just your truth?
Edit woops, seems like someone jumped into our two-day-old two-person conversation. Guess Ogre hasn't been posting in a while and someone got bored. But even a B (ok, probably an E) list poster caught your attention, I'm gushing!
The duplicates aren't "potential" but confirmed and that alone was enough to swing the state. Apparently a number of the findings had to be redacted from the report for some reason. Not sure why, seems kind of suspect.
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/arizona-senate-hears-multiple-inconsistencies-found-election-audit
I don't usually say this about zerohedge but I do appreciate that they provided the official rebuttals to claims made, almost like a fact-check.
As for the duplicates,
You can choose not to believe them, but zerohedge accepted it without contradicting the claim.
Not going to try to change your mind but that doesn't sound like an argument in good faith. If you challenge something, they provide a rationale and you say "well I don't care because I don't trust you to begin with so I'm going to ignore that", then are you really seeking the truth, or just your truth?
Edit woops, seems like someone jumped into our two-day-old two-person conversation. Guess Ogre hasn't been posting in a while and someone got bored. But even a B (ok, probably an E) list poster caught your attention, I'm gushing!