A magazine cover in a suburban supermarket checkout. WTF?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
I'm glad you have something that works for your pain, but if you don't see the difference between making a drug available as pain medication and pushing it onto the masses for trendy recreational use, you may want to consider that your personal situation has led you to have a biased view on weed's role in the culture.
I don't take pharmaceutical drugs when I'm in pain, but I never said that weed does not have positive applications. You inserted that into the conversation, which is why I think this is a very sensitive topic for you. This magazine is an example of the government pushing weed for nefarious reasons, not to help people like you who might genuinely benefit from its use.
I'm not sure if you're doing it on purpose, but you're using the same tactics that people on Reddit use when they encounter a point of view they dislike.
You asked me what I do for pain (present tense), and now you're trying to warp my response as a "gotcha" as if I stated I've never taken a pharmaceutical drug ever in my life. That's not what you asked, and that's not what I said.
Now, let me repeat my point and we can see if you are willing to address it instead of deflecting:
Weed has positive applications. The government is not pushing it for a positive reason. They want people docile and receptive to brainwashing.
you are not making sense--what are you looking for?