When anti gun “experts” want to debate you
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (137)
sorted by:
That's funny, you didn't mention the Stg-44 in your rants, only that the sturmgewehr was a new class of rifles.
Evidently what you meant and what you posted were evidently two separate things.
Evidently I guess..
I'm curious to know where does the Mp-43 and Mp-44 fit into this little fable tale of yours since they were the predecessors to the Stg-44.
You might want to look up what Mp stands for...
Do you even know the legal definition of the so called dreaded "assault weapon"?
I was content to write off your statements as inexperience and honest ignorance, now I just question your honesty.
That's because I didn't feel it was necessary, since it's so fucking obvious, I mentioned the intermediate cartridge from the beginning, can you fit an intermediate cartridge in a name? no, is most cases (and I know this is difficult for you to understand), a cartridge would go in a firearm, hence anyone with the barest minimum of intellectual capacity would assume other people to understand this concept, and make the connection that the person was referring to the rifle that carries the name, and not just the name itself.
By the way mp-43/44 were just early designations for the STG-44, I guess you didn't look it up hard enough.
Wow
Maschinenpistole
Doesn't look like..
Sturmgewehr
EARLY designation, you know the meaning of EARLY right?