When anti gun “experts” want to debate you
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (137)
sorted by:
That's funny the question that preface your post like it was proven fact was:
Sooo that would be a
fuck NO
Do you know what a zip gun is?
It's funny, there was a comment posted, not long ago, it went something like this:
You recognize the comment?
So it doesn't fire the same round?
this is truly amazing stuff, it's like trying to explain advanced mathematics to an amoeba 😂
So here's some math for you,
Your batting one out of thirteen, honcho.
Damn ant you just the pride of your town.
So anything that chambers and fires a M855 is basically a M4 and should be dutifully called a assault rifle.
Maybe AR secretly means Assault Round, or maybe just Asinine Reasoning.
My how far you've come from the twisted logic of the Stg.
My God, it's like trying to discuss something with a toddler...
I'm going to, once again, break it down peace-meal for you, in order for you to be able to understand (possibly, I'm going to break out the crayons if this doesn't work)
The discussion in which you inserted yourself, for no good reason, was whether or not the US military used AR-15s, my argument was that even though technically the M4 is not an Ar-15, they still function the exact same, and CAN fire the same round.
Quite obviously, if I'm suggesting a comparison between a M4 and an AR-15, it would suggest (to people with an IQ > 50 anyway) that said comparison would be with an AR-15 CHAMBERED IN THE SAME ROUND AS THE M4, as the majority of them are (you can't dispute this)
This has nothing to do with the assault term BS.
Look dude, I haven't got the time to keep arguing with a lesser mind, so bye bye