Still amusing that our justice system refuses to acknowledge evidence unless you go through very narrow processes, while there are laws that can prevent the evidence from being used even if it proves a crime.
E.g. two way consent laws. Very stupid; if you have someone outright stating that they hired a hitman to kill their wife, and paid them $3M, that's not considered admissible evidence because you broke a law to obtain it.
A bit of an extreme example but I used it to illustrate a point that the conditions for admissible evidence is bullshit.
Investigate further, yes. Verify the integrity, absolutely.
Still amusing that our justice system refuses to acknowledge evidence unless you go through very narrow processes, while there are laws that can prevent the evidence from being used even if it proves a crime.
E.g. two way consent laws. Very stupid; if you have someone outright stating that they hired a hitman to kill their wife, and paid them $3M, that's not considered admissible evidence because you broke a law to obtain it.
A bit of an extreme example but I used it to illustrate a point that the conditions for admissible evidence is bullshit.
Investigate further, yes. Verify the integrity, absolutely.