Apples to oranges, so much wrong with this response, I can't even. First of all, just try shooting someone who overstayed their welcome and see if the police agree with you... And this isn't a friend coming over to visit your HOUSE. This is a biological relationship of mother to child as nature intended and it is AGAINST NATURE to violently remove that child. Nature doesn't forget, either. There are multiple negative hormonal effects of abortion due to disruption of the pregnancy (not the same in a natural miscarriage) sometimes resulting in breast cancer, emotional effects that linger for decades, not to mention how many women are maimed and killed due to the shoddy "skills" of the butchers calling themselves doctors.
Yes, I disagree with the law and the law disagrees with me. I'm talking about what I personally believe the law should be, not how the law is written right now.
Imagine saying that we have the right to own fully automatic weapons unrestricted per the second amendment and some retard says "lol, no, try having a fully automatic weapon and seeing if the police agree with you."
This isn't a friend coming over to visit your house
Yes, it's actually worse. I believe that a person's body is even more under their control than their property.
It is against nature to violently remove that child.
The number of times I've seen chickens peck at, destroy, and ultimately eat their own fertilized eggs tells me that you're wrong.
yada yada emotional effect
Look, I'm not advocating for abortion. But the argument that it will negatively effect the woman, while a very good reason to not get an abortion, is not an argument for why abortion should be criminal, because that only affects her. The only debate here is about how it affects the fetus, who is the second party in this equation. And I believe it is within the woman's right to murder it, if that is necessary to remove it.
And that is why it is none of our business if someone wants to kill their baby. Is it wrong, of course, but they will have to live with it the rest of their lives and probably will not ever reach salvation. The point is it is not our choice to make for them. No matter right or wrong people will kill bc they have justified it for themselves. This is the same with the gun control argument, someone will still find another way to kill if that is what their intent is. Argueing over whats right and what's wrong is what they want, they want us weak, they want us tired, they want us in fear of, and the more we sit here and argue with each other over these topics that they navigate for us(bc if it wasn't in the news we wouldn't be focused on it right now) the more they continue to win. I chose to give my opinion not to argue but to get the wheels spinning for others, bc I didnt always see it this way.
Apples to oranges, so much wrong with this response, I can't even. First of all, just try shooting someone who overstayed their welcome and see if the police agree with you... And this isn't a friend coming over to visit your HOUSE. This is a biological relationship of mother to child as nature intended and it is AGAINST NATURE to violently remove that child. Nature doesn't forget, either. There are multiple negative hormonal effects of abortion due to disruption of the pregnancy (not the same in a natural miscarriage) sometimes resulting in breast cancer, emotional effects that linger for decades, not to mention how many women are maimed and killed due to the shoddy "skills" of the butchers calling themselves doctors.
Yes, I disagree with the law and the law disagrees with me. I'm talking about what I personally believe the law should be, not how the law is written right now.
Imagine saying that we have the right to own fully automatic weapons unrestricted per the second amendment and some retard says "lol, no, try having a fully automatic weapon and seeing if the police agree with you."
Yes, it's actually worse. I believe that a person's body is even more under their control than their property.
The number of times I've seen chickens peck at, destroy, and ultimately eat their own fertilized eggs tells me that you're wrong.
Look, I'm not advocating for abortion. But the argument that it will negatively effect the woman, while a very good reason to not get an abortion, is not an argument for why abortion should be criminal, because that only affects her. The only debate here is about how it affects the fetus, who is the second party in this equation. And I believe it is within the woman's right to murder it, if that is necessary to remove it.
And that is why it is none of our business if someone wants to kill their baby. Is it wrong, of course, but they will have to live with it the rest of their lives and probably will not ever reach salvation. The point is it is not our choice to make for them. No matter right or wrong people will kill bc they have justified it for themselves. This is the same with the gun control argument, someone will still find another way to kill if that is what their intent is. Argueing over whats right and what's wrong is what they want, they want us weak, they want us tired, they want us in fear of, and the more we sit here and argue with each other over these topics that they navigate for us(bc if it wasn't in the news we wouldn't be focused on it right now) the more they continue to win. I chose to give my opinion not to argue but to get the wheels spinning for others, bc I didnt always see it this way.