Here in the Great Southern Land of the Holy Spirit, we have some citizen journalists who have risen in profile thanks to the Cabal lunacy that is/was 2020/2021. One of those is a fellow who became a member of the Rebel News Team, the mob out of Canada doing breitbart-esque journalism. Name of Avi Yemini Twiffle account.
(Yes, he is denounced by some quarters as an operative of the Mossad, Mah Jewz, etc., but so far, he's doing a significant amount for the growing Freedom Movement in Australia. Personally, I don't have enough data to really evaluate, but so far he's doing far more good than harm, imo.)
Today he won a court battle to in which the court ordered Twitter to release the details of a particularly nasty shill account that has been spruiking the ... heheh ... virtues of the Marxist CCP Minion Daniel Andrews, who is currently Premier of the state of Victoria (think Newsom in California, or a tiny little state-level Turdeau. You heard me.) and acting anonymously but heck of a lot like an actual PR account (ref: my contribution to the mess): defending the Andrew's regime and attacking those who stand up against it.
I think the premise here is that the twitter account - name of PRguy who uses the image of a Simpson's character (reporter) as his avatar - has defamed Yemini and Yemini intends to bring a defamation suit against him.
So he took it to court, and the court ordered that Twitter has to reveal the details of the account.
This has the Leftist/Marxist shills and squakers all in an uproar. Bad precedent. Yemini's position, however, I think is quite reasonable. He's not doxxing the account; he wants to bring a suit against it and of course, that's not possible if the account remains anonymous. In other words, anonymity is important and fair, but not when it's used to break the law and violate other people's rights.
It's an interesting twist, because we are anons, and we know how destructive doxxing can be.
Is this a local win? Or should the account remain in anonymity?
I'd be interested to hear what the board thinks about this....
Well well, this is very interesting. I too am still wary of Avi, especially his Israeli military time served, and his calling out by Peekay Truth back in the day, but,... I definitely appreciate his accosting of WEF delegates in Davos recently with Aussie legend cameraman Rukshan. He also has seemed solid in his reporting of Aussie lockdown absurdities. Will be watching this story intently. Thanks for posting mate!
Edit to add: I honestly don't know what to make of it, if Avi is a good guy then great, let's get a victory. On the reverse of the coin, is this a DS circus side show? Personally, I like Avi and his brazen style. Time will tell...
I've been wary of them for a while, but I have to concede Ezra and his crew are the only ones in Canadian media who have consistently taken the fight to the enemy in media, and haven't taken (our) government funding, and Trudy hates them. So for the time being "the enemy of my enemy is my friend".
I can't believe everyone is evil, and to be fair a good Jew and a good Christian are both waiting for Christ. So I have to believe there will be some good Israelis who are sick of the same shit we are.
His military time could go either way on that point. I'm consistently surprised so many in our militaries are gullible to fall for the claptrap being consistently pushed, so I have to assume some in/from the Israeli military have to be doing the same eye roll when they hear of another terrorist attack that happened because everyone failed to do anything right that day and multiple people did things wrong - y'know like wedging a security door open.
I wholeheartedly agree with you fren.
Perfectly stated.
It's not that I like/support rebel news, but there aren't really any others (in Canada at least) that have the same level of reach/
Quite right.
Stay vigilant and expect the them to return to their true nature.
It's control the narrative and counter-narrative play.
It may well be.