If Elon actually wanted to terminate the deal, he would not threaten to do so, he would just do it. This is a tactic to further expose the enemy and also get Twitter at a discounted price. This move not only saves Elon billions of dollars, but most importantly it solidifies the reality that Twitter not only has a high bot count, but they went to great lengths to cover it up and profit off of the falsified user data.
This confirms Twitter was/is intentionally conducting the nefarious activity. This will lead to extensive audits and eventually, the exposure of calculated bot usage to sway public opinion.
Slowly but surely, the dark secrets of Big Tech are being put on display. One day, the world will know how political entities brainwashed the masses with bot manipulation.
The Democrat party, who committed treason for years via the Russia hoax in the name of “election interference”, are the ones actually engaged in mass psychological manipulation on social media to alter the outcome of elections.
And that’s just one element of their network to manipulate and control. Now consider all the other lengths the DNC went to alter the 2020 election:
-created an international black-site biological network -created and released a biological weapon known as C19 to justify the implementation of mail-in voting, killing millions in the process and ruining the world economy -used the flaws of mail-in voting to commit widespread voter fraud via ballot stuffing in swing states due to inflated voter rolls -used their control of mainstream media to push politicized disinformation and brainwash the public -used their control of social media to push politicized disinformation and cover-up negative true stories about the DNC (Biden Laptop)
Elon is exposing one major element of a greater conspiracy to control the outcome of US elections, and therefore the world. And it seems all of these elements are being brought to light in unison.
A seismic shift is happening.
-Clandestine
Reminds of another guy who who'd misspell tweets intentionally in order to draw media attention. His name is Donald Trump and the tactic worked quite well. You'd rather make snarky remarks about me than have a conversation though, so have a nice night.
I'll gladly have a conversation with you fren. Sounds like you think myself and others are claiming all mis-spellings don't matter and you are saying all misspellings matter. (Mis-spellings matter sounds like the next BS spinoff of BLM lmao) That's not the case Q did indeed say misspellings matter - I'm not disputing that. Anons would call Q out and literally question every single misspelling. Sometimes Q would say they are intentional and other times Q would say it was indeed just a typo stating "on the move" or something like that. So in this particular case the anons questioned Q and said hey you spelled SRIKE instead of STRIKE was this intentional? And Q replied (sauce in link posted above) "STRIKE" - on the move - Q. So basically Q is telling anons like you to not focus on this SRIKE mis-spelling because Q made a mistake and didn't intentionally mis-spell that word. Q doesn't want anons wasting time on the wrong things and this was one of those cases. So good eye catching the mis-spelling, Q has made many and some are intentional and could always use another look or interpretation so have at it I was just trying to point out that this particular one wasn't worth focusing on since Q said it wasn't meant to be spelled like that
Oh okay. I didn't know there were other instances of misspelling and a correction. I think I asked that in a different comment not directed towards you. So essentially, I wasn't sure if Q wanted to draw extra attention to this misspelling or if we are to ignore it. In any case, thank you for clearing that up.