I've seen a lot of these photos appear on.gaw to excite controversy and discussion. They are simply bunk and here is a page that provides the receipts. https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2021/01/fact-check-these-photos-are-not-associated-with-chemtrails.html This doesn't dispose of the other claptrap, but I think we will all have to agree that these photos are fake and not invoke them in future disputation. (It is also a comment on the gullibility and lack of discernment in those who have brought them forward as "proof.")
Comments (11)
sorted by:
What’s the point? Strawman argument? Why don’t you search engine real things. Stratospheric Aerosol Injection, Solar Radiation Management, ice-nucleating weather modification, universities solar geoengineering programs.
www.geoengineeringwatch.com
The geoengineering methods you point out are real however, none are related to so called chemtrails.
Why don't you just accept these photos are no proof? All the things you bring up are pipe dreams. People dream up big ideas all the time...and that is usually what they remain. (Been there, done that.)
Yes, the chemtrail patches and toggle switches are fake, like in a 80's Hollywood movie.
Q - says misinformation will spread to discredit the truth - This is no surprise, as we are in an information war
Cloud Seeding is real.
I see the grid patterns at home and everywhere I travel. I even see them in Mat's Off-road recovery videos in the clear sky of Arizona & Utah deserts.
The main questions for me are: #1 - what is the intent - is this to control weather by adding moisture to the atmosphere or for other purposes? #2 - what is the unintended impact - affects on air and water quality. affects of sun reflection or filtration.
Here is a MSM Yahoo news article speaking about cloud seeding:
Cloud-seeding: Are scientists ‘playing God’ or stopping climate-induced droughts? https://archive.ph/AC4DO#selection-669.0-669.81
The seeding programs are known, open, identified. You can easily find areas in Colorado, Nevada, and California under seeding programs. The aircraft are small. Not a problem.
Grid patterns mean nothing for commercial traffic patterns and ordinary contrail production. And the idea that they affect sunlight is sheer nonsense. I live where the skies are FILLED with clouds, all the time. Contrails are a trivial decoration.
You sound like a normie, defending Clinton going to Epstein’s island for vacation.
Only it’s infinitely easier to discover how and when jet engines produce contrails, the large military and commercial aircraft deployed in weather modification, and the stated purpose to dim the sun.
You have to research better if you intend to change minds.
The “chemtrail” term was injected to steer people away from doing their own research on weather modification programs, same as how ‘satanic pedophilia’ was used to keep normies away from researching Q.
I’m afraid you’ve fallen for it. But if you are red-pilled enough to realize the global power elite have many insidious plans to depopulate the planet while claiming to be saviors — and get richer off their crimes, it shouldn’t be too hard for you to connect the dots.
On "chemtrails," there are no dots. Just specks on some people's mental spectacles. I am a 40-year-veteran aeronautical engineer and am rather familiar with how contrails are produced. If you think contrails can "dim the sun" you are ignorant of something called cloud cover. (Those of us who live in the Pacific Northwest, would slap our knees in laughter at the thought contrails could be such a threat.) You sound like a Southern Californian, for whom any mark across the naked blue sky is a terrible blow against "normal" weather. You might enjoy this website: www.contrailscience.com.
“Chemtrails”??? What are these? Contrails dim the sun??? 🤣 typical shill tactic, accuse your opponent of something they do not claim only to ridicule.
I don’t know which is more absurd, a laughable suggestion (contrails could dim the sun! my sides!) or you posing as a Q researcher (the purpose of this board) thinking your silly narratives might stick.
You are clearly not interested in learning. Are you paid to coverup the catastrophic geoengineering “experiments”? Or do you really believe that denying reality will spare your from the consequences?
I'm only repeating what the "chemtrail" brigade says. I don't believe any of it. And since there is no reality to any of this, I'm not denying anything. What "geoengineering 'experiments'"? If they are "catastrophic" we might know about them, right? You guys go directly from sheer speculation to "they admitted it." I work to a higher standard than bias confirmation.
I am unimpressed with the "research" of the ignorant. I have a relevant and deep background and none of this passes scientific muster. Did you miss the amusing discussion of environmental aluminum?
You speak nonsense, not science.
I don’t know what board you’ll find the “chemtrail brigade” on, maybe bring your arguments over to conspiracies.
The science is that "chemtrails" are bunk. That's my position, based on a lot of relevant background knowledge and experience. I don't need to argue for the facts.
As for the "chemtrail brigade," I don't know anything about them other than what pops up here. Nice to know you have low regard for your fellow travelers.