Found out about this guy (never heard of him before) thanks to this post, about Truth Social banning Dr. Sherry Tenpenny. https://greatawakening.win/p/15IEcVVPfc/proof-that-truth-social-banned-d/
I followed the links. Seems far and away clear that Tenpenny was banned by TS.
However, she links this guy from her GAB account. https://gab.com/busydrt
So, I listened through his podcast to find out the details, and some are provided, but then he goes into HIS explanation of why DJT is now sucking up the Swamp, reaching out to Big Tech, starting to get in on the censorship game, etc.
Basically, he goes on an anti-Trump rant, examines Trump from the decidedly Normie perspective that DJT is just some politician who is corrupt and degraded and now showing his true colors.
Barf. I get seriously ugly vibes from this guy. (As I describe in my comment on the aforementioned post, here.)
Much as Tenpenny has a lot of cred and I give her lots of cred accordingly, sorry. I've got far too much information and understanding and evidence that informs me to give my trust to DJT (and by proxy, the TS team) than any doctor who, while nobly motivated, is focused on ONE aspect of the world and may really not know or even understand about what the Deep State is really doing, or how the Cabal works. Certainly trust DJT more than an alt-media commentator who appears quite confidently to think he knows much, much better about Trump and what Pres. Trump is or should be doing than Trump himself.
What does the board think? Do they know this guy? Has he a track record?
Iām not sure it really matters. Reading about Dr Tennpenny and TS is disconcerting. The foundation of TS is free speech. If accurate the TS business model is disingenuous and people are once again getting a crafted narrative.
Well, frankly, what I see is knee-jerk reactionism playing out by dozens of folks who seem to have been trained to leap to the worst possible conclusion and assume bad faith.
I can easily imagine half a dozen scenarios where this situation evolved and emerged without any malicious or duplicitous or bad faith intentions here. So easy to imagine these plausible scenarios, and yet so many people seem to have as their first thought:
"Gee. TS banned Tenpenny. Obviously TS is (wrong/bad/duplicitous/disingenuous/evil/etc)"
in other words, the presumption of guilt, instead of the presumption of innocence. Is this a zeitgeist reside from the Depp/Heard case?
In my view, DJT and Nunes and TS have earned the right to be given the benefit of the doubt UNTIL all the facts come to light.
I agree! Truth was supposed to be a spark of light thrown into the darkness that surrounded our freedom and our 1st amendment ! Weather you like Dr tennpenny or not , all of the Drs that we respect concerning the jab and vaxxs in general have looked to her as a pioneer of truth as to the damage the jab , flu shots , most big pharma meds and childhood vax in general have caused ! She was stating what she has always sad with yesrs of research to back her up ! The jab is dangerous and is killing some and causing others to have life long illnesses . WE on here believe this . To agree that she should have been banned for saying this is absurd ! As LordkekKingston stated , we cannot let our bias get in the way of truth even if it cast Trump in a negative light ! It's one thing for DJT to advocate for the jabs it's another for him or his site to ban someone who disagreed with him ! This is a left behavior and a real slippery slope ! I'm bummed beyond belief ! Let Dr Tennpenny talk , TS can disagree with her take on the jab , but to silence her , my God think about that ..
So, presume guilt (on the part of TS) until proven innocent?
Do you have ANY of the facts, other than Tenpennies account was 'banned'? Do you know the reasons? Do you know how it happened? Who made decisions, if they were made? Why? If glitches occurred? If there is a breakdown in the system that is STILL currently being built and is likely far from perfect?
Frankly, I'm bummed because I see so many frens here ASSUMING guilt on the part of Truth Social, instead of the opposite.
PS. It looks like her account has been reinstated, although not fully functional, so .... are we allowed to presume or consider that the problem is actually being worked on, instead of going all black pill for a while? <sarc>
PPS. Take care in what you choose to believe; what you choose to believe is what will define the emotions you experience, and emotions can either cloud or enhance judgment.
Dr T 's assistant said no reason was given for the supposed permanent ban , she was just banned , however anti vaxx research info was posted , so presume that's why! There was a major backlash and outpouring of support for DR T and from what I understand even more support that " anyone"was silenced , banned , on a free speach platform , regardless of her stand on the jab ! so I hope this is corrected ! No one should be banned whether you're anti vaxx of pro vaxx ! Other people have been warned or post deleted or whatever they call it for speaking about topics concerning " All lives matter ,, many on here who showed there warnings or tempory bans ,, whether that's true I don't know it may have been made up but at the time I checked previous post an comments from the person and he/ she appeared legit ! I never rechecked or even bothered to remember those complaints , and didn't comment however Dr T's was bad ,, a mistake is highly unlikely, she was banned for her vaxx stance , but if Devin or someone else from TS admin comes out to say it was a total mistake that should have never happened and will never happen again ,, well than I'll be the first to cheer ! Until than I oppose this ban and everyone should ! TS is our only hope right now as it is supposed to stand by the first ,, a big part of our freedom depends on the first!
This is a good point. We need to consider all angles, Anons. Even if it casts Trump in a negative light, we can't let our bias get in the way of truth (no pun intended). Also, this Tenpenny / TS fracas cannot be ignored, either. Makes me wonder if Truth Social was a red herring all along? I'd like to know the actual truth as to what's happening behind the scenes...
Bias isn't the problem. Judging the action without knowing why is.
I can't even get an account. Bit I do t think it's a conspiracy.
So.... presumption of guilt until proven innocent, is that it?
This all took place within the last 36 hours. Your not even applying the 48 hour rule.
Come on....
Thank you for what you said , I referenced you on a different comment on here
Mayne it was so tbey could flush out some shit