What if the real goal is to legally expose the players?
And to serve up data for tribunals for treason?
And prepare the public for military tribunals?
These people were all involved in a plot to overthrow the government, and a minor conviction isn't going to move anyone's needle relative to the crime.
Maybe just a dumb question, but I thought I'd ask to see if anyone else is having similar thoughts and questions.
Well - you'll accuse me of dooming here (maybe I am a little bit), but to put a different and likely unpopular twist on the question "what if Durhams goal is Not to get convictions" - maybe Durham is actually part of the swamp, and is just running cover for these folks. If so, the goal may be to indict folks, have them not be convicted (adjudged innocent), and then they are free to go about their lives. No double jeopardy.
Honestly, I do certainly HOPE that my comment above isn't true and that the actual end goal is tribunals. But evidence being introduced is useless unless someone or some entity will actually act on it.
We still don't have any confirmation that this is or will happen.....
All he had to do is leak some documents, and his cases lose their strength. There's always the risk of a trial not going the way you expected - why take the chance unless you plan to throw someone under the bus?
These things need to be taken in the context of the bigger picture. If the DS was in control, they wouldn't need False Flags every time something important is happening, or to distract from what the patriots are doing. They would be all over the trials, more than happy to show the world how righteous they are, like they always have in the past. Pay attention to their words - not what they are saying, but the words they use to infuse negative or positive emotions into a story or situation.