Modern Christianity has turned into a globohomo promoting parasitical institution. Female leaders, dykes, trannies, fags given high ranking positions.
Bending rules and accepting homosexuality under the guise of "Jesus loves all".
The old "hate the sin not the sinner" bullshit which has been fundamental in causing modern Christians to accept homos into their lives and church as if the Bible isn't crystal clear on what the crime and punishment is.
Pedos everywhere, money being laundered from crime syndicates and pushing covid, jabs, WEF you name it.
By human nature we do NOT respect those who fold on their principles. No one is going to respect an institution that is weak and can't hold steadfast the rules of God.
This isn't to say that man doesn't make mistakes. But what the Church does is not mistakes. It is by design to corrupt our youth and mold our minds.
I do NOT believe Jesus Christ was some pussy who accepted everything. I highly doubt Christ would walk into a gay pride today and love every homo who wears a diaper and dances in front of children with degenerate parents who bring them there.
Christ rampages through the temple when he witnessed the corruption with money just imagine what he would do if he saw this degenerate modern day garbage filling our streets.
Now think what you may of Muslims but at least they have held their beliefs together for the most part. I've NEVER witnessed a Muslim family accept faggotry. Never.
Same with Jews. Lots of gay Jews and their people certainly push it onto society (Khazars) but you'll never see that shit openly accepted in their communities.
Every third pastor these days is half a fag and allows it in his church.
It is admitted by all church authorities that no record of anything Jesus said was recorded.
His father according to the Bible was a wicked alien called yahweh. Yahweh is neither immortal or a God..he drank 6 litres of wine a day and then beer he liked the abdomen fat of women and babies..there are over 600 commandments he left with tribe of Jacob who picked him as their commander. There are written records..it was only 5000 years ago!! Jesus was a hybrid alien but not immortal. His mother and Mary's mother also hybrid aliens.read your Bible..but as there was no word for god in old hebrew or eternity when you read god think elohim..or angel or lord.it is the aliens
See my comments for links.
You are referring to the biblical manuscripts, A manuscript is a handwritten copy of an original writing. Obviously, the tape recorder was not invented yet. So, all manuscripts were hand copied.
There are 24,363 manuscripts of the Bible. After the papyri manuscripts were discovered, an abundance of other manuscripts came to light. We have manuscripts that date to 60 AD within a generation of Jesus' live (i.e. Magdalene papyrus, 7Q4 and 7Q5 of Qumran 68 AD).
There are tests of historiography that all books of antiquity are judged by for their authenticity. In comparison, Aristotle wrote his writings of poetics in 343 BC and yet the earliest copy [manuscript] we have is dated 1100 AD. That’s nearly a 1,400-year gap in time. Only 5 manuscripts are in existence. Caesar composed his history of the Gallic wars between 58 – 50 BC and yet the earliest copy we have is a 1,000 years after his death. Only 9 to 10 copies now exist.
Incredibly, people do not question the authenticity of these writings. We take them to be fact. I have alluded to one of the tests of historiography where the number of manuscripts and the earliest copies are evaluated. This is called the Bibliography test. I can challenge anyone to muster up the top 10 read books of antiquity and they still won’t come close to authenticity of the Bible. In addition to this, we have the living line of “Church fathers,” (Ignatius, Polycarp, Clement of Rome, et al.) From these writings outside of the New Testament, there is the entire New Testament – all but 11 verses. They quote the writings of the gospel and epistles 232 times.
The Internal Evidence test is another feature of the Tests of historiography. This test examines what the writers have said about the events that took place. Aristotle’s dictum is implied – “The benefit of the doubt is to be given to the document itself, and not arrogated by the critic to himself.” As an analogy, if I told you I owned a green coat, it is your responsibility to prove I do not own one. Until then, it is assumed that this is indeed the truth. In law, I believe this premise is called the law of presumption.
You will find at least 23 different times the writers of the New Testament recorded they were “eye witnesses.” Moreover, they proclaimed Christ Jesus and His resurrection often to hostile crowds. They appealed to the knowledge of their listeners when speaking about Jesus’ resurrection. They spoke of it as a fact, as common knowledge, which any public speaker knows is risky business. They wrote about people, places, times that corroborated with each other’s testimony. Each writer expresses the story from their personal experience, from how the events affected them just as witnesses today would describe indelible events they experienced. These Gospel writers died terrible deaths. Peter, James (son of Apheas), Andrew, Philip, Simon, and Bartholomew were all crucified. Matthew and James (son of Zebedee) died from the sword. Thaddeaus was killed by arrows. And the brother of Jesus was stoned to death. John was dipped in boiling oil several times, but wouldn’t die. He must have impressed his torturers because he was then exiled.
The External Evidence test is the third test of historiography. It accounts for whether other historical material confirms or denies the internal evidence found in the manuscripts. There are over 21 documents that are widely accepted by archeologists outside of the books of the Bible. These all confirm the message of the New Testament. Some of these are Flavius Josephus, Justin Martyr, Plineus Secondus, Tertullian, Cornelius Tacitus, Hippolytus, Polycarp, Lucian of Samosata, Suetonius, Thallus, Phlegon, Mara bar-Serepion, the Talmud, Eusibius, Irenaeaus, Ignatius, Origen, Cyprian, Clement of Rome, et. al.
The fact of the scientific method of using the Tests of Historiography proves the Bible is by far the most 'authentic' writing of antiquity there is. In a court of law the evidence would be overwhelming in favor of the authors and eye-witness accounts.
The oldest Bible (OT) in existence is the Septuagint (285 BC). All original Bibles (OT+NT) are copies of earlier versions. The earliest versions are written in Koine Greek. These include the Uncials, papyrii, Syraic, etc. Greek was the international language spoken throughout the Levant, Egypt, and Turkey. Jesus in all probability spoke and read Greek.
The written Hebrew today is a poorly reconstructed language referred to as 'Neo-Hebrew'. The Masoretes were Talmudic scribes that recreated a written 'Hebrew' from Arabic and other sources in 1000 AD. It is not the same written language of the ancient Israelites. The written Hebrew of the Israelites is lost in antiquity and the reason why the Greek Septuagint was written.
I wouldn't be depending on Neo-Hebrew words if I was you.
Ancient Hebrew had only consonants and was indecipherable without oral knowledge. As an example of why ancient Hebrew (without vowel points) is indecipherable, suppose the English word "cat" is used without the vowel. It would simply "ct". Without a knowledgeable source such as the priesthood had, no one would know what "ct" means. If one guessed, it could be any of the following words -- 'cot', 'cut', 'coat', 'cute', 'act', 'tic', 'cite', 'cote', 'coot', 'otic', 'taco'....
This is why the ancient Hebrew depended on the priest class having a lifelong learning of the written language to know precisely what the written words meant. The ancient written Hebrew was depended on oral knowledge to decipher.
By the 3rd Century BC, Paleo-Hebrew was dying out. There was great trepidation among Israelite priests and scholars that the written language would \ soon be lost in antiquity. If the written language of the Bible hadn't been translated into the Koine Greek in 285 BC in Alexandria, to which 72 scribes were gathered, much of it would have perished.
Lots of tablets have been discovered in cuneiform writing that confirms that aliens not God or gods invaded earth. That is the important point. So what that god,/alien said or did is not relevant