Yes. I use literacy in my thought process to decode the words of others. For instance, reading my words you would see that I didn’t say he’s as bad as Obama I said his fame stems from a bad thing (the presidency of his half brother) and I wish it had not occurred.
Now I see the problem. You have to read a whole sentence, not a piece of one, to understand what it says/means.
The significance of "kenyan" in the sentence is that without an obama presidency kenyans would be all but totally irrelevant to me--as proved by the fact that the only kenyans quoted on all of GAW are obamas.
Yes. I use literacy in my thought process to decode the words of others. For instance, reading my words you would see that I didn’t say he’s as bad as Obama I said his fame stems from a bad thing (the presidency of his half brother) and I wish it had not occurred.
You said
" I didn't have to even think about anything any Kenyan says."
Why mention Kenyan at all? What is the significance of it?
Now I see the problem. You have to read a whole sentence, not a piece of one, to understand what it says/means.
The significance of "kenyan" in the sentence is that without an obama presidency kenyans would be all but totally irrelevant to me--as proved by the fact that the only kenyans quoted on all of GAW are obamas.
Ok. I just don’t see any value for including it. But to each their own.
And now you see the value of the term's inclusion because it's been explained several times. Different strokes for different folks.