Nukes and truth; more in comments.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
Whatever nukes are or were, they are not what government says. Think about it for yourself.
Have you heard of suitcase nukes? Has the news reported lost material for thousands of nukes from the former USSR? With the open borders both North and South, why would terrorists with years of planning and resources plant a regular bomb at the WTC? (Not 9/11, the earlier one under Bill Clinton.) Did Hiroshima and Nagasaki produce generations of mutant children? How about Fukushima? Does wildlife thrive at Chernobyl? Can you buy a Geiger counter? Can you make one?
8 decades of nuclear fear, but with all the crazy loose cannons and suicide bombers in our world, not even one has pulled off a successful Slim Pickens explosion? Is our government competent in this area despite failing every other? Does "Duck and Cover" sound useful today? Will everyday face masks seem useful to normies in 10 years?
How many bombs have names? Why might you name a bomb Little Boy on a plane called Alone Gay (yes, I know it's Enola) and the next one Fat Man from a Boxcar? (Bockscar.) Did the Trans-Siberian railway have boxcars? Was it completed around that time? Would that matter to Japan?
Did the bikini swimsuit exist before nukes were tested on Bikini Atoll? Why would its designer publicly say it was named in honor of the nuclear tests?
Think for yourself. Research for yourself. Look at the image again. We are not meant to live in fear.
Why, yes. I have one. Try one of these.
Radiation, including from the bombs dropped on Japan, does increase cancer risk but not to the extent commonly believed, and mutations in the children of atomic bomb survivors (or the creation of giant spiders, as in the movies) has not been observed so far as I know.
On the other hand, atomic fission is a reality attested to by thousands of physics experiments, by hundreds of nuclear power plants, by many atomic bomb tests, and by the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which included the deaths of roughly 200,000 people. From the article linked above:
Also:
Another point: Creating the fissile material for a nuke is incredibly difficult and expensive, and creating a bomb FROM that material is also non-trivial.
Finally, on the naming of the bikini swimsuit:
Ever hear of marketing?
Those are all good counter arguments. I agree that the atomic model is an accurate representation of reality.
There are plausible arguments positing that both Nagasaki and Hiroshima were caused by conventional weapons. I haven't done original research, but I have seen others' research and believe this is likely. Once you begin to research from a different perspective, you can find more evidence. Obviously if the nuclear bomb were false, the secret would be closely guarded. In any case, proving a negative is not possible. A person should use discernment. But nearly 80 years of conflict with very powerful people striving for power, and no nuclear explosions against people, even while we are told they are smaller and more powerful than ever before, gives room for doubt.
I agree, there's always room for doubt. That's the true foundation of science: keeping an open mind.
Many cities in Europe and Japan were leveled by saturation incendiary bombing, a truly heinous war crime (Kurt Vonnegut's Slaughterhouse Five is based in part on Vonnegut's actual survival of the Dresden firebombing; he was a war prisoner working in an underground slaughterhouse when the air raid began).
I don't think it likely that such a raid caused the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki; such raids involved multiple waves of many, many bombers. But who knows . . .
Micro-nukes are alleged to have been used (along with thermite on the upper floors) to bring down the Twin Towers; the evidence I've seen seems credible. Beyond that possibility, why haven't we had terrorist (or government, or accidental) incidents with nukes of whatever size? Just lucky? Good work by those tasked with preventing such events? Aliens helping us out?
I have no idea.
I shopped for Geiger counters a few years ago. I found the reviews interesting. In the end I didn't buy one- if they are real I don't want to be in a position to use one; if they are fake I wouldn't want to rely on it. And they're kind of expensive without a need, and incidental to my argument. I probably should've left that out.
Out of curiosity, if you use your Geiger counter regularly, do you have a way to check if it works without subjecting yourself to radiation? Genuine question.
I haven't checked the counter (a Mazur PRM-8000) for accuracy but it does indicate background radiation in my house and elsewhere. I bought it after the Fukushima disaster. So far, only normal levels. I keep it on a shelf in my office and can see the light blink, usually several times per minute.
Sooo all the tests in the desert that people could see from Vegas were fake?
TNT explosions look very similar.
Ask yourself... Why did they provide the footage? Simply to promote fear in our enemies? Why have there been no modern film releases of the devices since? Was it all just propaganda?
To be clear on my position, I'm actually in dissent with OP and DecodingSymbols on the existence of nuclear devices.
I believe they do exist, but none have been used militarily. I think the efficacy of a chain reaction is far too uncontrolled outside of a nuclear reactor, and the reliability of such a device scales so wildly as to be unusable outside of a dirty-bomb scenario.
I believe in the Firmament, which means all things have a triune realization. Exoteric (Actual Nukes and Nuclear Fission/Fusion exists), Esoteric (Comms for Explosive Blackmail that can level a Nation, AKA "Q-Level-Clearance"), and Spiritual (Global FEAR of Mutually Assured Destruction)
Could be a different kind of show.
Agreed. And in this movie it's going to be very spicy with Crazy Nancy saying Trump's a mad man and telling Milley to remove the football from the crazy man!
I think we're going to find out that nukes have ALWAYS been fake news, and the public is going to connect those dots to Nancy and say what gives?