Barr is always pretty careful with his statements about voter fraud. Usually something along the lines of 'not seeing enough evidence to change the outcome of the election'. This could mean that they had everything in place to track the votes in real time (or near real time) and the outcome as they see it, is that Trump won. This would seem to techically be true if we believe that devolution is in place and that DC is now occupied enemy territory. Which is required to activate the laws of war correct? 11.2 If I remember right.
Barr is always pretty careful with his statements about voter fraud. Usually something along the lines of 'not seeing enough evidence to change the outcome of the election'. This could mean that they had everything in place to track the votes in real time (or near real time) and the outcome as they see it, is that Trump won. This would seem to techically be true if we believe that devolution is in place and that DC is now occupied enemy territory. Which is required to activate the laws of war correct? 11.2 If I remember right.