The error is in thinking that we even need to know either way, or that someone should be scolded for speculating on a forum that is primarily about speculation.
Maybe, just maybe, the point is that if we're confused then the cabal is also confused.
if we're confused then the cabal is also confused.
Likely true, and a valid point.
But no one is being "scolded for speculating", at least not by me. I merely pointed out that Trump has publicly skinned and eviscerated Barr, then put all the fat and guts in a giant blender and hit FRAPPÉ—calling him weak, fearful, spineless, selfish, concerned more about his job than his country, suggesting he's a traitor—and that when people see Barr acting that way and Trump calling him out for it, they STILL take it as some sort of "evidence" of Barr's being a white hat.
That willingness to use anything people say, positive or negative, as proof they're helping Trump is what I was calling attention to.
The error is in thinking that we even need to know either way, or that someone should be scolded for speculating on a forum that is primarily about speculation.
Maybe, just maybe, the point is that if we're confused then the cabal is also confused.
Likely true, and a valid point.
But no one is being "scolded for speculating", at least not by me. I merely pointed out that Trump has publicly skinned and eviscerated Barr, then put all the fat and guts in a giant blender and hit FRAPPÉ—calling him weak, fearful, spineless, selfish, concerned more about his job than his country, suggesting he's a traitor—and that when people see Barr acting that way and Trump calling him out for it, they STILL take it as some sort of "evidence" of Barr's being a white hat.
That willingness to use anything people say, positive or negative, as proof they're helping Trump is what I was calling attention to.
And Sessions.
And he also endorsed Romney and endorsed McCain.
Time for pattern recognition to kick in. Or better yet, the realization there is no pattern to recognize.