Besides just Ben Fulford, I have had this same questions about other sources like David Willcock, etc... that leads us all to a two-fold question.

1. Why is it that sources on both sides on the good/evil dichotomy have chosen one, single person to give very secretive information (intelligence) to? Why them? Why only one person? One channel?

2. Given the nature of Ben's posts (and others like him), then one side or the other would likely be very pissed (for instance in this post The Vatican)... so how is it that he can even still be alive? The only logical answers are either he is just being used to create (deliver) confusing propaganda OR he is a sole-source channel to get out the truth occuring behind the scenes (on purpose).

We safely assume that the occurances he reports on are very fluid thus changes quickly and would render his reports as less than 100% on-target as the situations mature but even so, some of these claims can't change... such as things like Putin, Trump etc are actors, clones or stand-ins because they are dead or in prison. Or of course, it is all just complete bullshit.

Most of us are looking for this type of intelligence to explain what is really happening (hidden from our view) and make sense of the things we do see. So what some of us will try to do is sew the dots together and get a better scope and clearer picture. For example, the esoteric info from David Wilcock, very esoteric info regarding off-planet activities from sources like the Wingmakers (Dr. Neruda interviews) and planet based intell from the likes of Fulford, Simon Parks (and similar)... all tied back to mainstream sources like Tucker Carlson and Jessie Watters. Then filter in all the so-called whistleblowers. It is hard to take any political players from any country as anything by manufactured bias so we take most of MSN sources with a grain of salt... except those who back it up with evidence. Tucker and Watters do provide some of this.

All this leaves even the most dilligent and dedicated researchers confused and with more questions than we started with. We know only a fraction of what we find is actually true... but is that 10%? 50%? 75%? And which parts? We just don't really know for sure. This leads us to a very vulnerable position and that is WHO (on earth) can ever come forward to give the planet truth that we can asbolutely depend on WITHOUT being seriously cautious that we are just being manipulated in the end due to all our confused states and visceral desire for answers. I don't think it will come from religions orbits, nor political orbits or from any present global organizations currently in place.

Anyone else share my perlexed disposition on this?

-The Human Primer