Besides just Ben Fulford, I have had this same questions about other sources like David Willcock, etc... that leads us all to a two-fold question.
-
Why is it that sources on both sides on the good/evil dichotomy have chosen one, single person to give very secretive information (intelligence) to? Why them? Why only one person? One channel?
-
Given the nature of Ben's posts (and others like him), then one side or the other would likely be very pissed (for instance in this post The Vatican)... so how is it that he can even still be alive? The only logical answers are either he is just being used to create (deliver) confusing propaganda OR he is a sole-source channel to get out the truth occuring behind the scenes (on purpose).
We safely assume that the occurances he reports on are very fluid thus changes quickly and would render his reports as less than 100% on-target as the situations mature but even so, some of these claims can't change... such as things like Putin, Trump etc are actors, clones or stand-ins because they are dead or in prison. Or of course, it is all just complete bullshit.
Most of us are looking for this type of intelligence to explain what is really happening (hidden from our view) and make sense of the things we do see. So what some of us will try to do is sew the dots together and get a better scope and clearer picture. For example, the esoteric info from David Wilcock, very esoteric info regarding off-planet activities from sources like the Wingmakers (Dr. Neruda interviews) and planet based intell from the likes of Fulford, Simon Parks (and similar)... all tied back to mainstream sources like Tucker Carlson and Jessie Watters. Then filter in all the so-called whistleblowers. It is hard to take any political players from any country as anything by manufactured bias so we take most of MSN sources with a grain of salt... except those who back it up with evidence. Tucker and Watters do provide some of this.
All this leaves even the most dilligent and dedicated researchers confused and with more questions than we started with. We know only a fraction of what we find is actually true... but is that 10%? 50%? 75%? And which parts? We just don't really know for sure. This leads us to a very vulnerable position and that is WHO (on earth) can ever come forward to give the planet truth that we can asbolutely depend on WITHOUT being seriously cautious that we are just being manipulated in the end due to all our confused states and visceral desire for answers. I don't think it will come from religions orbits, nor political orbits or from any present global organizations currently in place.
Anyone else share my perlexed disposition on this?
-The Human Primer
You believe neither, it's not a good idea to believe any stream of info when we are in a massive psywar.
Fulford and Wilcock were two I encountered early as my red pill adventure blasted off in 2007. over many years and from greatly expanded base of sources, I concluded that both of them are mostly nuts. sincere, interesting, but nuts.
Wilcock is a narcissist and his "research" is cherry picked to support his attention-seeking work. if he gets you to do more digging on a topic, good. just check his conclusions against actual scientists and historians.
Fulford may be a result of childhood programming or too many drugs, or both. give him credit for always reporting "news" in context of the cabal and powers behind the scenes, but once you build your own antenna array of news sources, you find that Fulford is not a primary source, or even early on breaking news.
the thing about Fulford to keep in mind is he's a utopian globalist at heart, as if taking down the cabal and confiscating their centuries of ill-gotten gains would cure the world of its ills.
We live in a soup pot full of misinformation. The MSM is a shit show of propaganda and the Alt News is full of propaganda agents, hucksters and shills. Be careful who you believe. If they claim to speak to Q ala Simon Parks, Charlie Ward and that ilk, RUN!
I read Fulford for entertainment. Willcock is way too out there. If you want realistic info - read John Solomon, Tom Fitton, Greg Hunter.
Those seem reliable but there is an esoteric layer underpinning it all... sort of have to figure that into the equation. That would be quite different sources.
Clif high pours scorn on Parkes Wilcox a whole heap of them. I think fulford gets stuff to print from disinformation agents...he is keen to tell you queen Elizabeth is a good person on the side of right when we know she is black nobility..owns one sixth of the land in the world.. concealed wealth..used to be head of bilderberg.... working for MI6 who want the royals to remain..when they are all corrupt and need to go.
Clif high is getting true history and stuff out there.. especially the truth about the annanuki/elohim in the Bible being aliens that invaded 5000 years ago ..not God...not gods..just vicious cruel aliens that the tribe of Jacob recorded. There is masses of evidence from professors transcribing Sumerian tablets being found everywhere.. Michael tellinger on the fossil found in massive quantity in South Africa..etc
Read the Wingmakers materials...Dr. Neruta 1- 5 interviews..
I've read Fulford's stuff for years because for possible clues about what's going on. Beyond that I don't give it a whole lot of credence.
I also read Wilcock's stuff for a number of years, again for possible clues.
One thing they have in common is the tendency to make it sound like something is about to break open in a big way. Certainly much is coming to light now, but not in the way they've seemed to imply.
https://benjaminfulford.net/
Since the early 1980's, once I got a peak behind the curtain and a glimpse of Oz, I have developed an extremely thick and bushy Bull Shit Filter. One must develop discernment, cover a Lot of info, and believe very little of it, but evaluate it ALL as new info emerges.....
Does David Icke fit into this somewhere also? A lot of what he says rings very true to me, but there is also stuff that I really have difficulty accepting.
My disposition is getting more and more perplexed. No question about that!
Fulford is tight with the Rockefellers. I assume almost everything he says is propaganda and disinformation. Wilcox is an occultist and influenced by demonic powers.
Any further questions?