Q never said that Trump would be put back into office before 2024. Sometimes I feel as if half of the people here didn’t even read the Q posts. Theories coming from other people hold no weight, and need to stop being considered “well Q said”.
Exactly. People have taken Q drops and built theories and drawn conclusions.
It's understandable, because uncertainty is torture. We have all the Q information, and we want to understand what is going on, and find a way to both explain and also accept certain things.
But ultimately, it's critical to draw the line or border between what Q has dropped on the one hand, and what theories and interpretations have evolved from there on the other. I wouldn't say they have no weight, but they definitely should not be be given the same level of credence that Q's drops are.
Devolution theory is a case in point. It seems to make a lot of sense, but did Q ever use the expression? What about continuity of government? No, and no.
(One of the things that surprised me when I first noticed Patel Patriot and heard his story, was the fact that he apparently expressed never following Q or not being very familiar with Q content.)
When listening to Kash in this clip, it hits rather hard when he says:
What we need to do is to put out what happens, and what needs to happen, and put to bed any conspiracy theories, because that doesn’t work for anyone.
Obviously, if Kash is part of Q or have privileged knowledge about the Q operation, he cannot spill the beans. But also, what if many of us have missed the key points, and are being distracted by theories that are, in fact, inaccurate and distracting?
Q never said that Trump would be put back into office before 2024. Sometimes I feel as if half of the people here didn’t even read the Q posts. Theories coming from other people hold no weight, and need to stop being considered “well Q said”.
Exactly. People have taken Q drops and built theories and drawn conclusions.
It's understandable, because uncertainty is torture. We have all the Q information, and we want to understand what is going on, and find a way to both explain and also accept certain things.
But ultimately, it's critical to draw the line or border between what Q has dropped on the one hand, and what theories and interpretations have evolved from there on the other. I wouldn't say they have no weight, but they definitely should not be be given the same level of credence that Q's drops are.
Devolution theory is a case in point. It seems to make a lot of sense, but did Q ever use the expression? What about continuity of government? No, and no.
(One of the things that surprised me when I first noticed Patel Patriot and heard his story, was the fact that he apparently expressed never following Q or not being very familiar with Q content.)
When listening to Kash in this clip, it hits rather hard when he says:
What we need to do is to put out what happens, and what needs to happen, and put to bed any conspiracy theories, because that doesn’t work for anyone.
Obviously, if Kash is part of Q or have privileged knowledge about the Q operation, he cannot spill the beans. But also, what if many of us have missed the key points, and are being distracted by theories that are, in fact, inaccurate and distracting?