It's a simple equation.
Imagine you're a NWO head.
The NWO ain't happening anymore. All your plans are on fire and in the process of being retailored just to keep you in some modicum of power...
So, it's back to the Status Quo -- Elites ruling over the Chattel.
The Woke agenda was supposed to destabilize the Nation, and that it did.
But you can't rule over ashes, though some of your comrades might wish to burn it all down on their way to hell.
You, on the other hand, want to go back to how things were; Presidents owned by special interests, Secret Societies keeping it low-key, corporate collusion kept the market in the hands of those who "deserve" it...
Just none of that End-Times Prophecy, Satanic bullshit and child trafficking.
You just want to go back to being a Wizard ruling secretly among the Muggles, with all the Voldemorts and Death-eaters left in a pile of ash.
So, what do you do when you look at the Global Birthrate Crisis you helped create, soon to be a complete collapse of humanity due to the "vaccine" depopulation agenda that only worked within a NWO reality, and is leading to the distinct likelihood all your investments into Bitcoin, Gold, Petro-Dollars, and other naked-shot market stocks are all going up in flames simultaneously and you'll be left penniless and hated by a ravenous mob of Frankenstein's monsters wanting revenge?
FUCKIN' HEEL-TURN!
Everyone was ready to let the bus roll down the cliff, but you had a change of heart once everyone started eating each-other alive. Now you gotta jump in and pump those brakes!
Issue Number 1, the Population.
You gotta reverse the damage done. You gotta get people fuckin' and raising families that don't die, aren't criminals, and will work in your slave mills.
The Agenda now is as follows:
- Ban Abortion
- Ban Contraceptives
- Ban Prostitution
- Ban Single-Sex Schools
- Discourage College and University for Women
- Villainize Same-Sex Couples for contributing to the "Birthrate Crisis"
- Ban Transgenderism and Drag
- Ban Topless Bars and Night Clubs
- Removal of all Woke and "Love is Love" Corporate Propaganda.
- Restrict Simping, such as Thots, Titty-Streamers and Only-Fans on the Internet
- Crack-down on Catfishing
- Restrict Pornography like Japan does, where everything requires censor bars and blurring.
- Teach Sex-Ed in schools at younger and younger ages, with increase focus on encouraging reproductive habits over gratification.
- Set up dating centers around the US
- Ban Tinder, Grindr, and all other "Hook-up" apps.
- Offer completely free Dating Sites (that work and aren't 10% narcissist women, 90% thirsty men), subsidized by tax monies.
- Increase tax-breaks for families with more than 2 children.
- Encourage young women (even minors) to have sex and get married younger.
- Encourage a culture of "promise rings"
- Pay men to marry ugly women.
- Bring back Boy Bands to get young girls attracted to men.
- Push IDOLs, like Britney Spears and those in Japan to get men horny for young/cute over glamour/punk so they can start popping out babies sooner.
Anything and everything that might detract from a population boom MUST GO!
Now, from a Conservative perspective, much of this would be a "YES, PLEASE!" platform. That's the selling-point.
In reality, it's only done to encourage baby-making; not because the nuclear family is valuable; not because it's morally correct; not because it's a Christian thing to do...
No... It's specifically because there is shortage in supply.
You need cattle to be a rancher. If the cattle are sparse, you need to horny them up and incentivize baby-making, not just sex.
Why is this a problem for us Patriots and Anons?
Because it's deceptive and potent. Because it builds upon a moral framework, but goes too far. The heel-turn will be from Radical Authoritarian Liberalism to Radical Authoritarian Conservativism, and it will happen at the drop of a hat with thunderous applause. Our applause.
Some things should be banned, I agree. Other things CANNOT be banned, and will only lead to people being incarcerated for so much as drawing nude anime girls online -- not because pornography is wrong morally, but because:
"The Government has declared you cannot do that. The Science says it does not support a breeding culture. You must breed for the Greater Good™. Obey."
For me, personally, the motive in pushing these bans matters, even if it is the morally correct decision. Over-Enforcement and Control has always been the issue. We shouldn't trade one set of Authoritarian Dictates for another.
We should, instead, ban Authoritarian Dictates and simply incentivize good behavior.
PS... It's happening right now. They're going to toss "Gender Studies" under the bus. My wager is before the end of September. RINOs will lead the way, so they can get in on the ground floor of the Conservative Authoritarianism.
Can someone explain to me why we need more people? I don’t believe we should purposefully kill people off like the deep state wants but I seriously don’t get why people on here want more people. I live in a high populated area and would love if there were 20% less people here.
If you suddenly have 20% of the population retiring because they're too old to work with no one to replace them, you've got yourself a recipe for an economic collapse.
Even if you kill off those 20%, the entire infrastructure of some cities was tailored to support a large population. Calculations in traffic, food availability, labor, and investment were made for GROWTH not DECLINE.
The city will collapse, and anyone stuck there along with it. Labor will be in such high demand, those who can work will be overworked and under-paid. Businesses would rather leave and start smaller businesses where they know they can find workers.
What's worse, is that if you're too busy working just to keep the city's lights on, you have no time for baby-making, which leads to even more population decline.
It gets to a point where there aren't enough children, and the parents are too busy, and the old people too much of a burden, that the whole thing devolves into a chaos. You can't just build a system that relies on a ton of people without a ton of people to run it.
Remember Goldilocks? One chair is too big, one too small, the last is just right? It's every bit of an issue having a city with too few people as it is to have an over-crowded city. The city is designed to run with a minimum amount of people working as well as maximum.
I think what it really comes down to is that Civilization is like a car. Once you get up to a certain speed you can't just stop on a dime without having your head bash into the dashboard. You gotta ease off slowly. Even a 2-child policy doesn't account for population loss due to tragedies.
Look at Detroit. Believe it once housed over 2M people, last two decades it’s fallen under a million. The city is fighting and coming back in many ways, but there are plenty of areas that are straight up in ruins.
Now multiply this by everywhere.
"I'm old enough to remember..." there was once a US president who worked feverishly to bring companies back to American soil for production, decreased unemployment rates for ALL classifications, and actually had a plan to improve America. Hmmm..... (Could really 'cut a rug', too.)
The entire history of humanity leaves ruins.
I'd like to recommend to you a podcast I heard last week: "Mysterious Universe - Decivilization" Episode 27.23. In it, the cohosts discuss the book, "The End of the World is Just the Beginning." The book makes the case that birthrates are already too low everywhere and that it's too late to change. Globalization and global trade are nearly over. We've built up our societies to a point that we can't go back, yet we can't sustain it.