That delicious moment when you call to cancel your tv service for being too gay and the rep that answers is waaay over the top flamboyantly gay, and asks why you’re canceling. Like sing-songy trying to hide from life’s mistakes, can’t untaste a dick kind of gay. It’s dish network btw. Mainly had it for weather and cartoons. Was watching Cartoon Network and they did a self promo with 2 female child characters making out. Immediately called to end service and got this character on the line. I’m not gonna pay $100/mo to indoctrinate my kids. I’m sure our convo ended up on his twitter feed yesterday.
That is all.
Constitutionalists understand that if they're not breaking the Constitution, it's fine. Sorry, not sorry.
It's worth thinking about how this all starts. A young man who was abused as a child and seems a little effeminate wants to become a priest. He seems kind, devout and, in his own way, charismatic. But he's obviously gay. You think, what's the problem? After all, priests are celibate; who cares who they are not having sex with?
After a while, more and more gay priests are ordained. They become pastors, vicars-general, bishops and, eventually, cardinals. Gay priests look for other gay priests and help them get ahead. Fifty years pass, and all the priests seem a little off.
And now you're stuck. Vocations are down (no heterosexual Catholic man would ever want to be a priest), so much so that you are importing priests in from India, Nigeria and Latin America. The only native English speaking priests who are qualified to be pastors are the aging gay priests. So you look the other way when a priest shares a condo with his "friend" and hope for the best. You'll make a big show of disowning the worst offenders, but minor stuff can be ignored, right? Fr. Gay promised to stop being so touchy with the seminarians.
And on it goes. More scandals pop up, fewer vocations happen, more Catholics leave the Church, and all the while the priesthood gets more and more gay. But remember how this whole mess started: you felt pity on a gay young man and decided to bend the rules a little.
All I see is annoying babble.
Liberty is what matters. Until someone actually hurts someone else, they are just as free as anyone else.
Literally go stick a dildo up your own ass if you think you're going to try to force someone else to adhere to your views based on a crime they didn't commit.
And no, being gay is not a crime. Hurting kids is. Which is not the default of being gay.
Hmm..
Annoying babble = too triggered to even read it. I thought it was very informative.
Insult: "stick a dildo up your ass"
Hmm.. 🤔 You're not a faggot, are you? Were you molested as a child? You seem awfully upset over facts and are trying to debate with feelings. 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔
No, it's really quite simple.
If you want the Constitution to protect your rights, it will also protect people you don't approve of. It can be as inconvenient to you as it is convenient.
What a weak minded individual. Attempting to use a leftist tactic to assign a socially taboo label to me within our own group to outcast me and my arguments because you can't handle that a Constitutionalist will argue the protection of things that you don't like.