My thought was oofo, but I didn't want to say oofo, because, you know, whether aliens are flying their craft around our planet or not, or whether oofos are our hidden tech or not, the primary thing an oofo machine produces, is cognitive dissonance.
Basically if anyone still doesn't understand at this point that UFOs are 100% real, and numerous, there isn't much more that can be done to help them. I was the biggest skeptic in the world. But now the US Navy has officially admitted to it FFS. NASA astronauts have admitted to seeing them while orbiting earth, with video proof.
People say they want proof, and then they disregard all video evidence, no matter how voluminous and credible.
Short of a personal alien visitation and being allowed to briefly pilot the spacecraft, what would they ever find convincing? Some of them still can't understand that the earth is spherical.
I made up "oofo" (I think I made it up) because I got tired of saying "U" "F" "O" in my mind every time I would read it (plus I think it's funny).
As for UAP's being real, I think that's pretty evident (I also was a huge skeptic prior to recent declas). I mean, the choices at this point are:
The U.S. Navy/government is hoaxing us on oofos
They exist, and represent technology that has mastered gravity.
If you choose (1), then you must believe that the U.S. Government is conspiring to lie about their existence OPPOSITE to their previous lie. It's quite the conundrum because in every case, whatever you choose you are a... Conspiracy Theorist!
If you choose (2) that has subsections of choice:
It's Aliens
It's hidden tech.
These are not mutually exclusive. Some could be aliens, some hidden tech e.g.
Alternatively, we could have a hidden relationship with aliens and they could have given us this tech.
Alternatively we could have FOUND them (say, in the Nevada desert in the 1940s) and reverse engineered their tech.
Alternatively, this could be "new" tech for us (relatively speaking, i.e. Teslatech), no aliens involved.
Alternatively, we could have had this tech for a long time (millennia), no aliens involved.
I have seen evidence that supports all of those alternatives. I have no idea or leanings in any direction, except that I think the specific oofos shown by the Navy are "ours."
Definitely not, unless we engineered them from tech we got from "them". They move unlike anything on earth, disconnected from the normal laws of physics. Antigravity. No sound. No wings or rotors. No air resistance. Unreal acceleration.
Inertia, and momentum can be controlled electrically. When you remove inertia from the equation, you have no resistance to movement. Acceleration is instant. The flying saucer tech has electric fields around it same as the earth does. This enables the craft to have it's own gravity field within. Any occupants inside the craft would experience half a G, even making 90 degree turns, and accelerating instantly. This also helps moving through space micro meteorites would be deflected upon coming into the Craft's electric field as these objects would instantly lose their momentum, and just bounce off the shield. Amazing Technology, they will start World War 3 before they left us have it.
Definitely not, unless we engineered them from tech we got from "them"... disconnected from the normal laws of physics
There is no such thing as a "law of physics." Physics is nothing more than a set of mathematical models that have predictive power. Our models say nothing about how the universe actually works. They only speak to how well we can use what we have learned about it. The universe simply Is What It Is.
With respect to how these ships move, all that is required is a mastery of gravity, not "antigravity" per se. Even our models of physics suggest such a thing is possible. General Relativity fully supports such movement, it just requires something called "negative matter." Even that's only partially true however. It really only requires an ability to contract and expand space. We know how to contract it very well (both energy and mass contract space). We don't know so well how to expand it (thus the negative matter), but it is entirely conceivable to find another way to do so, including through electromagnetism. There are even efforts to do exactly that with some (small) measure of potential success.
With the amount of hidden tech I know about (such as the mountains of evidence for Cold Fusion e.g.) which I knew about long before I had any idea of the Cabal, it would not in any way surprise me if we had this tech ourselves. I myself could build such a device... if I had negative matter (or otherwise could figure out how to expand space.) My senior thesis paper was on the solutions to the metric (General Relativity) that would allow for exactly such manipulations of spacetime as would be required to move the way they move.
No matter where the tech came from, the principles that drive it are the same. Thinking we are "no where close to that" is not really true at all. We are really only one step away. It would be trivial to hide that one step from the world given their full control of all things science and media.
My thought was oofo, but I didn't want to say oofo, because, you know, whether aliens are flying their craft around our planet or not, or whether oofos are our hidden tech or not, the primary thing an oofo machine produces, is cognitive dissonance.
u/#aliens
Funny! Haven't seen that one before
Basically if anyone still doesn't understand at this point that UFOs are 100% real, and numerous, there isn't much more that can be done to help them. I was the biggest skeptic in the world. But now the US Navy has officially admitted to it FFS. NASA astronauts have admitted to seeing them while orbiting earth, with video proof.
People say they want proof, and then they disregard all video evidence, no matter how voluminous and credible.
Short of a personal alien visitation and being allowed to briefly pilot the spacecraft, what would they ever find convincing? Some of them still can't understand that the earth is spherical.
I made up "oofo" (I think I made it up) because I got tired of saying "U" "F" "O" in my mind every time I would read it (plus I think it's funny).
As for UAP's being real, I think that's pretty evident (I also was a huge skeptic prior to recent declas). I mean, the choices at this point are:
If you choose (1), then you must believe that the U.S. Government is conspiring to lie about their existence OPPOSITE to their previous lie. It's quite the conundrum because in every case, whatever you choose you are a... Conspiracy Theorist!
If you choose (2) that has subsections of choice:
These are not mutually exclusive. Some could be aliens, some hidden tech e.g.
Alternatively, we could have a hidden relationship with aliens and they could have given us this tech.
Alternatively we could have FOUND them (say, in the Nevada desert in the 1940s) and reverse engineered their tech.
Alternatively, this could be "new" tech for us (relatively speaking, i.e. Teslatech), no aliens involved.
Alternatively, we could have had this tech for a long time (millennia), no aliens involved.
I have seen evidence that supports all of those alternatives. I have no idea or leanings in any direction, except that I think the specific oofos shown by the Navy are "ours."
Definitely not, unless we engineered them from tech we got from "them". They move unlike anything on earth, disconnected from the normal laws of physics. Antigravity. No sound. No wings or rotors. No air resistance. Unreal acceleration.
Inertia, and momentum can be controlled electrically. When you remove inertia from the equation, you have no resistance to movement. Acceleration is instant. The flying saucer tech has electric fields around it same as the earth does. This enables the craft to have it's own gravity field within. Any occupants inside the craft would experience half a G, even making 90 degree turns, and accelerating instantly. This also helps moving through space micro meteorites would be deflected upon coming into the Craft's electric field as these objects would instantly lose their momentum, and just bounce off the shield. Amazing Technology, they will start World War 3 before they left us have it.
There is no such thing as a "law of physics." Physics is nothing more than a set of mathematical models that have predictive power. Our models say nothing about how the universe actually works. They only speak to how well we can use what we have learned about it. The universe simply Is What It Is.
With respect to how these ships move, all that is required is a mastery of gravity, not "antigravity" per se. Even our models of physics suggest such a thing is possible. General Relativity fully supports such movement, it just requires something called "negative matter." Even that's only partially true however. It really only requires an ability to contract and expand space. We know how to contract it very well (both energy and mass contract space). We don't know so well how to expand it (thus the negative matter), but it is entirely conceivable to find another way to do so, including through electromagnetism. There are even efforts to do exactly that with some (small) measure of potential success.
With the amount of hidden tech I know about (such as the mountains of evidence for Cold Fusion e.g.) which I knew about long before I had any idea of the Cabal, it would not in any way surprise me if we had this tech ourselves. I myself could build such a device... if I had negative matter (or otherwise could figure out how to expand space.) My senior thesis paper was on the solutions to the metric (General Relativity) that would allow for exactly such manipulations of spacetime as would be required to move the way they move.
No matter where the tech came from, the principles that drive it are the same. Thinking we are "no where close to that" is not really true at all. We are really only one step away. It would be trivial to hide that one step from the world given their full control of all things science and media.
It's using the normal laws of physics, just manipulating things in ways that most would not consider or entertain as possible.