Post Midterms - DOJ Dismantle (The Start)
Q-analysis!
POST MIDTERMS
FBI / DOJ - 1st.
Why must the DOJ & FBI be cleaned FIRST?
"They are resisting the will of the American People" - Trump
((Lock her up Chant))
"It's being proven we have a rigged system, but it doesn't happen so easy, but this system is gonna have a lot of changes" - Trump
"We have 1000s of people under surveillance, oh, surveillance that sounds familiar" - Trump
(Trump hinting at the fact he knew back then what Durham just exposed to the world)
RSBN Version - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NAmR5osPCs8
Except there is no crime that you could charge a SCOTUS justice with for having done so. This is not illegal. No statute governs this. If anything, it is an internal SCOTUS rule violation, presuming they have such a thing. Otherwise, it is just customary practice amongst the justices.
The corrupt justice Abe Fortas routinely shared the court's internal deliberations with LBJ. That was likely the main reason LBJ put him there to begin with. And it was well known amongst the other justices. There was a lot of back stabbing in the 70's on the Burger court. It got so dysfunctional, some of the justices refused to even speak to each other. Just like Biden is salvaging Jimmy Carter's legacy, so too is John Roberts salvaging Warren Burger's legacy.
You do think it would be illegal to publicly leak future Supreme Court upcoming cases/rulings? I’m sure there are federal laws against this mainly because these type of matters are most likely classified until it is made public by the appropriate person.
Nope. Not illegal. Congress cannot dictate the rules of a separate branch of government. In the same way that Congress cannot legislate who can practice law in front of an article 3 court. And SCOTUS cannot dictate to the Senate or House how they conduct their business. SCOTUS, if they wanted to, could conduct their deliberations publicly on live television and internet stream. Congress could not demand secret deliberations. Of course, that would be a shit show. But nothing could be done about it.
It’s not illegal at all. There’s nothing classified about them. There’s nothing making publishing a preliminary opinion unlawful.