The PEOPLE (general public) questioning the NARRATIVE forces the MSM to “adjust” and “alter” the NARRATIVE in an attempt to recapture control. After a point this pressure becomes so great that the PUBLIC is writing the NARRATIVE.
Loss of NARRATIVE CONTROL (generalized information) means MSM must “change” the subject (expend ammunition) to make a new NARRATIVE before the public becomes too skeptical of the former Narrative.
i.e Ulvade GUN CONTROL narrative is falling apart. Conspiracy theorists and PUBLIC are picking too many holes. They can’t come up with enough “excuses” for all the plot holes. Only way out is to make a new “EVENT” and quickly change subjects.
This is a Military-Civilian alliance.
Keyboard warriors deal great damage by our constant attacks on the “NARRATIVE”. Finding the plot holes forces Fake News into corrections.
Since their NARRATIVES are based on lies they make mistakes (plot holes) that observant anons can spot and hammer. MSM must “explain” in an attempt to prevent “PUBLIC AWAKENING” to their lies.
It works like this:
I tell you B beat C.
You ask, "Why?"
Now I must explain, "B hated C because B is a misogynist."
You point out that B isn't. B has a wife, daughters and three sisters.
I must further explain. Each question pushes me to write more "narrative" to explain my original story. Eventually I've written so much that I get lost in my own lies and I start to make mistakes in the plot. There are things I didn't think about. Maybe I didn't know something vital about B's history or the location the "attack" happened or the angle of the camera. You force mistakes in my lies (narrative).
Every time anons/ public point out a weakness or push for more answers we weaken their narrative and force them into likely error.
Ulvade was just a simple "school shooting" story, but now look at them scramble to explain the mysterious hour, all the doors not locking, the teacher propping open the door as the killer comes, ect.
Even they start to get lost in their own lies. Their attempts to straighten it out among each other only leads to further errors as the narrative gets too complex. Eventually they have no choice but to changed the subject and exhaust another "event".
This strains their control of the NARRATIVE and exposes them further.
That is why Conspiracy Theorists constantly questioning the "NARRATIVE" is so dangerous to their control. We force them to write more "story" to explain the plot holes.
Failure to explain will mean being caught in their lies and risk public awakening. They can't allow that so they change the subject when the lies of one story are about to be exposed do to relentless public exposure.
You describe the proble. With lies. With lies a person's narrative is too shallow Nd can not withstand questioning.
Whe. I was LE, we did a test. We had 2 officers in training g play bad guys. Gave them a story and an hour to make up and agree to as much detail as possible about the story.
Then we pretend to stop them, do a roadside interview on both. Ask about 5 questions before their entire agreed upon narrative is used up and the lies exposed.
Two people can only come up with a narrative so deep. Eventually you will ask questions they didn't plan for and the answers won't jive.
Not only this, but we show normies how the other school shootings were similar to the Uvalde shooting, thus resurrecting Sandy Hook, Parkland, etc., and bringing them back into the spotlight.
I'm still mad about the memory hole of the child terrorist training camp hidden underground in the desert that was plowed out and destroyed without investigation.
u/lonewulf
This is my interpretation of it:
The PEOPLE (general public) questioning the NARRATIVE forces the MSM to “adjust” and “alter” the NARRATIVE in an attempt to recapture control. After a point this pressure becomes so great that the PUBLIC is writing the NARRATIVE.
Loss of NARRATIVE CONTROL (generalized information) means MSM must “change” the subject (expend ammunition) to make a new NARRATIVE before the public becomes too skeptical of the former Narrative.
This is a Military-Civilian alliance.
Keyboard warriors deal great damage by our constant attacks on the “NARRATIVE”. Finding the plot holes forces Fake News into corrections.
Since their NARRATIVES are based on lies they make mistakes (plot holes) that observant anons can spot and hammer. MSM must “explain” in an attempt to prevent “PUBLIC AWAKENING” to their lies.
It works like this:
I tell you B beat C.
You ask, "Why?"
Now I must explain, "B hated C because B is a misogynist."
You point out that B isn't. B has a wife, daughters and three sisters.
I must further explain. Each question pushes me to write more "narrative" to explain my original story. Eventually I've written so much that I get lost in my own lies and I start to make mistakes in the plot. There are things I didn't think about. Maybe I didn't know something vital about B's history or the location the "attack" happened or the angle of the camera. You force mistakes in my lies (narrative).
Every time anons/ public point out a weakness or push for more answers we weaken their narrative and force them into likely error.
Ulvade was just a simple "school shooting" story, but now look at them scramble to explain the mysterious hour, all the doors not locking, the teacher propping open the door as the killer comes, ect.
Even they start to get lost in their own lies. Their attempts to straighten it out among each other only leads to further errors as the narrative gets too complex. Eventually they have no choice but to changed the subject and exhaust another "event".
This strains their control of the NARRATIVE and exposes them further.
That is why Conspiracy Theorists constantly questioning the "NARRATIVE" is so dangerous to their control. We force them to write more "story" to explain the plot holes.
Failure to explain will mean being caught in their lies and risk public awakening. They can't allow that so they change the subject when the lies of one story are about to be exposed do to relentless public exposure.
Or that's my take.
You describe the proble. With lies. With lies a person's narrative is too shallow Nd can not withstand questioning.
Whe. I was LE, we did a test. We had 2 officers in training g play bad guys. Gave them a story and an hour to make up and agree to as much detail as possible about the story.
Then we pretend to stop them, do a roadside interview on both. Ask about 5 questions before their entire agreed upon narrative is used up and the lies exposed.
Two people can only come up with a narrative so deep. Eventually you will ask questions they didn't plan for and the answers won't jive.
The truth on the other hand...
Not only this, but we show normies how the other school shootings were similar to the Uvalde shooting, thus resurrecting Sandy Hook, Parkland, etc., and bringing them back into the spotlight.
This is a very important factor. They want people to memory hole past events so you don't try and form a correlation to them.
I'm still mad about the memory hole of the child terrorist training camp hidden underground in the desert that was plowed out and destroyed without investigation.