I do believe the majority of responsibility falls to the woman, since she is the one who can get pregnant. But I get tired of those who put the entire onus on the woman. Like the saying says: It takes two.
Edit: I’ll state this better, Judge Thomas has said several rulings need to be looked at by SCOTUS. My interpretation are that these are the cases on same sex marriage and contraception.
Not a constitutional right. And he is correct. It's not a right protected by the constitution, neither is marriage. It's a state issue. I agree with him 100%
There is no sauce. u/ILoveIvermectin is just passing along internet lies.
That said, Griswold vs. Connecticut SHOULD be overturned as well. Long historical BS of 'deep state' involved since the 1920-1930's to get birth control allowed.
If a person is against abortion, why are they FOR contraception? The end goal is the exact same. Interruption of a life. That begins at conception. An interruption of God's creation. Different angles to same end.
If you are implying God is against contraception, the closest thing I could find was Er pulling out. It's in Genesis. He did that to not split inheritance with the son his wife had before him. God punished him and he died. This is more of a text to show God takes care of the widows and does not reflect God's thoughts on contraception. So taken out of context, some verses may seem like God opposes contraception a. Is there any other place where God opposes it?
How hard can it be for these whores to learn to use birth control instead of murdering babies ?
It takes two. Birth control should be a man's concern as well!
I do believe the majority of responsibility falls to the woman, since she is the one who can get pregnant. But I get tired of those who put the entire onus on the woman. Like the saying says: It takes two.
I agree.
They like the control they have over men by deciding whether the child can live or die.
Clarence is going after birth control next.
Edit: I’ll state this better, Judge Thomas has said several rulings need to be looked at by SCOTUS. My interpretation are that these are the cases on same sex marriage and contraception.
Sauce
Read Judge Thomas’s opinion
Not a constitutional right. And he is correct. It's not a right protected by the constitution, neither is marriage. It's a state issue. I agree with him 100%
There is no sauce. u/ILoveIvermectin is just passing along internet lies.
That said, Griswold vs. Connecticut SHOULD be overturned as well. Long historical BS of 'deep state' involved since the 1920-1930's to get birth control allowed.
If a person is against abortion, why are they FOR contraception? The end goal is the exact same. Interruption of a life. That begins at conception. An interruption of God's creation. Different angles to same end.
If you are implying God is against contraception, the closest thing I could find was Er pulling out. It's in Genesis. He did that to not split inheritance with the son his wife had before him. God punished him and he died. This is more of a text to show God takes care of the widows and does not reflect God's thoughts on contraception. So taken out of context, some verses may seem like God opposes contraception a. Is there any other place where God opposes it?