DOJ does not issue statements like these disagreeing with Supreme Court rulings. It doesn’t happen. It has no lawful basis. This can only be seen as a direct threat against the judiciary by Stasi agents. - The Great Awakening

DOJ does not issue statements like these disagreeing with Supreme Court rulings. It doesn’t happen. It has no lawful basis. This can only be seen as a direct threat against the judiciary by Stasi agents. (www.revolver.news)

posted 2 years ago by seernewday 2 years ago by seernewday +79 / -0

6 comments

6 comments share save hide report block hide replies

Comments (6)

sorted by:

▲ 8 ▼

– RC22 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

Things are just getting started from what I read .

permalink save report block reply

▲ 7 ▼

– deleted 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

▲ 2 ▼

– WolfDownSnickers2 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

I like this, lol

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 5 ▼

– TSearch 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

At least there is one thing we can say Mitch McConnell did that was good. Praise the Lord we don’t have a Justice Garland!

permalink save report block reply

▲ 5 ▼

– harkk 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

I guess they forgot they're going to have to argue cases in front of those justices. What does Schumer have to say about ticking off intelligence agencies? Ask him this also applies for SC justices.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– Notimportant81 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

This is some serious stuff. Rather like Fort Sumpter stuff.

Pray.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– LBTrumplican2 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

It's like there are two governments or something.

permalink save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q