What if the content of R_v_W isn't as significant as we think and it's moreso about states rights getting a SCOTUS precedent? I know some things are happening in AZ and TX where the GOP is rejecting the 2020 results so maybe this entire ruling was just to give more legal ammo to the states when they start challenging the results of 2020. That would explain why RvW gets the ball rolling finally and is the 113 marker. "Once 11.3 verifies as 1st marker" and why it "had to be this way". States rights needed to be brought to the fore before the election can be corrected.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (69)
sorted by:
So they never reverse bad policy, just push more bad policy under guise of good intentions.
No, read what poster is saying. If you give the asshats in charge right now the ability to gut the Constitution, they will gut the Constitution. The protections provided by the Constitution are the only things keeping us from having a full blown tyrannical dictatorship.
Dude, I think Act of 1871 created a corporate placebo constitution that allowed for 13th-15th+++ amendments.
They will fuck up now because they will not clean up all the mess Act of 1871 made so that the US can go back to its original constitution that has been dormant ever since.
They wont cleaning up because they are bankrupt and it's way down on their priorities list. They'll just disband as an institution. Broken up maybe as a monopoly which it certainly is. And try to reform infer some new mask.