I'm gonna take two weeks to decide on whether I think the real Q is back, even if given 100% irrefutable evidence. There is too much tension and too much of a chance for chaos should this be some ruse.
Proofs are necessary at this stage. Any new Q posts need to prove beyond a statistical doubt that Trump's Truth posts and Q's Posts are posted synchronously, just like in the old days.
Deltas with Trump's Truths are the only thing that will convince me beyond a reasonable doubt, and a fair number of them at that.
Q posts, then Trump posts shortly after. When the time between the two shrinks, it shows they are calibrating for further proofs. This convergence of timestamps shows Q has foreknowledge of Trump's posts before he makes them, and was how Q initially showed he was legitimate way back when.
You don't have to join me in this trial of cynicism, but with all the shenanigans lately, I am erring on the side of caution.
I only ask that you don't assume I'm dooming when I try to poke holes in Q's comeback. I'm simply performing my due diligence as an autist.
This is really simple. All "Q" has to do is post an unusual phrase a minute or two before Trump posts the same phrase.
For some reason, Q has never done that. Yes, there have been close deltas to Trump's tweets in the past, but I could easily write a script that watched Trump's Twitter feed and made a predetermined post to 8kun within a second or two. Repeat the script until everyone's convinced.
No, the proof must come before Trump, not within the same minute, not within seconds. It has always bothered me that Q has never utilized this very simple way to prove he is who he says.