While I'm not arguing with you (YOU actually have a valid point, although I disagree), what you say is moot for the discussion.
I don't believe Dave, or any other red piller would go so far as to impersonate Q just to generate ad revenue. It is asinine and idiotic to believe, and the very concept comes from shills who don't understand what the movement is or where it comes from or what it believes.
Oh, I don't believe someone impersonated q with the tripcode and everything for revenue.
If it was impersonated, it was for the intent of sowing disagreement and chaos, not revenue.
That I agree with you on.
Whether it really was Q or not, idk. The lengths people go to to disprove it seem kinda shaky to me though. Feels like when you have an intention and will go to the end of the world to back it up, just because.
While I'm not arguing with you (YOU actually have a valid point, although I disagree), what you say is moot for the discussion.
I don't believe Dave, or any other red piller would go so far as to impersonate Q just to generate ad revenue. It is asinine and idiotic to believe, and the very concept comes from shills who don't understand what the movement is or where it comes from or what it believes.
Oh, I don't believe someone impersonated q with the tripcode and everything for revenue.
If it was impersonated, it was for the intent of sowing disagreement and chaos, not revenue.
That I agree with you on.
Whether it really was Q or not, idk. The lengths people go to to disprove it seem kinda shaky to me though. Feels like when you have an intention and will go to the end of the world to back it up, just because.