Honestly, ad revenue didn't even cross my mind. If this was a black hat operation and they impersonated Q, my guess would be that they would make Fake-Q try to provoke anons into violence - or at the least they'd make the posts then have the Parrot-stream Media start blaring "LOOK! LOOK! DEM QANONS IS TERRORISTS WE TOLD YOU!" and then the Clowns would go about arresting people with the "evidence' from CNN.
One question for the ones still doubting: why now? Why start larping as Q so suddenly after 2 years of absence from the Q team?
Just from that regard, leads me to think these new posts are actually Q.
Because the Manstream Media also moved on it like clockwork.
Calling people dumb or stupid for being skeptical until we have proofs is not helping and reeks of drinking Koolaid.
This is the digital age. If they can steal an election, they can steal a tripcode. We knew Q was legit from the first because Q provided proofs.
Therefore, I want more evidence before I make a decision on whether or not I trust. I think that is perfectly reasonable.
That is a perfectly rational though process. Nothing wrong with asking for more evidence and being skeptical in a war.
Just please, no more nonsense about ad revenue.
Honestly, ad revenue didn't even cross my mind. If this was a black hat operation and they impersonated Q, my guess would be that they would make Fake-Q try to provoke anons into violence - or at the least they'd make the posts then have the Parrot-stream Media start blaring "LOOK! LOOK! DEM QANONS IS TERRORISTS WE TOLD YOU!" and then the Clowns would go about arresting people with the "evidence' from CNN.