Pretty powerful 🔥”A message to the Left, from a gay man. It wasn’t enough”🔥 The great awakening is expanding (link to original tweet in comments)
(media.greatawakening.win)
đź’Š BIG RED PILL đź’Š
Summarizing the entirety of a person's lifestyle based on a couple characteristics like sexuality as inherently evil is not helping anyone. If anything, you are actively destroying your own ability to reach the ears of people who otherwise may be open to listening to good arguments and changing their minds on various topics.
I would also say it's rather demeaning to boil down the entirety of a person's existence to just a few key traits and pretending like that really summarizes inherent nature. I know a ton of Christians who are plenty fine with being a terrible person to others 6 days a week and praying on the last one.
Just like the post above, if a gay person really wrote and thinks that (which let's be real - there 100% are people like that who exist - maybe not the majority or the norm, but they exist) do you really believe that talking down to them from your high horse and telling them directly, "There has been net zero benefit to this country from that lifestyle being allowed to rot our society", or essentially, 'You have no value to society' in other words, is helping anyone?
It's not.
And I don't get my morality from random strangers on the internet either, so pardon me for not hopping on the bandwagon. Everyone else is only human, they know no more or less than any other human about the potential existence of god and any ramifications of morality it ensues. People who claim to are con artists. That is why belief is referred to as "faith", not "fact". Religion is by design structured around belief.
If you really believe that their lifestyle is inherently evil, then fine. Leave it up to the god you believe in to judge them. You aren't the judge and your word matters no more than any other's in regard to morality, because you aren't privy to some special divine insight on these matters. In the end, two people can only end up talking past each other if this is how you want to proceed.
I think this rhetoric is overwhelmingly destructive to the most important goals of anons, which is waking people up and getting them united on the most important issues like our constitutional rights and the corruption in DC. I would happily accept the political support of any American who calls out the groomers for what they are, regardless of whoever they stick it in at home (as long as it is legal and consensual, of course).
You keep associating what I write about lifestyle with some individual person. Not sure what you don't understand. The lifestyle, promoted outward and accepted by society in it's institutions brings about nothing but inherent evils because the lifestyle is inherent evil as told to us by God as clear as day. And if you don't believe in God then you can observe the degeneration of the US and correlate it with the acceptance of homosexuality and feminism.
It's almost as if you can't see what it brought about the moment society accepted that "they just want to blend in and be normal" was okay.
There are far more important issues than just Constitutional Rights, fren. Without a society that understands the most important things are God followed by family, there is no Constitutional Rights.
I never argued that two people wanting to do whatever they want to do in private is my business. I very specifically wrote, several times now, it's when those decisions enter the *public" and any of it's institutions that the problems begin.
I'm not sitting on a high horse, I'm calling it what it is and no matter how much you want to defend them and accept their shit into your home, your life and whatever else, it's not going to change the reality of the situation.
Your morality is from the education system, mine comes from a higher power.
Look, I don't want to berate you or beat a dead horse on this, but I just think you are wrong about a lot here and I'd rather be honest. None of this is out of ill will, either.
---Again, this is how you are talking about your fellow man with direct quotes. This is what I mean when I say "Destructive":
"The problem with him is that he doesn't understand that his lifestyle is inherently evil and the idea that he just wanted to blend into society was never going to work. It's like saying "I just want this cancer to blend in with the rest of my healthy body". No, it doesn't work. Eventually, that cancer is going to spread because it's nature is to spread."
"There is no such thing as blending in. That community should have no say in society when it comes to their lifestyle. It should not be accepted and there will never be a time where that lifestyle will simply blend in and not corrupt the rest of society even if they got rid of all "others" like trannies and infinite gender freaks."
---This is YOUR morality, not mine or anyone else's. These are YOUR beliefs, and they are BELIEFS not FACTS, as direct quotes. This is how you look down on others:
"I wrote their lifestyle was inherently evil. And it is. Regardless of what you think and how you feel about them, it is." <- This is called an opinion, not a fact. If it were really fact, it would be falsifiable. It is not an equation that can be proven.
"The lifestyle, promoted outward and accepted by society in it's institutions brings about nothing but inherent evils because the lifestyle is inherent evil as told to us by God as clear as day." <- This sounds like assuming you are the voice of god
"Homosexuality is described by Abrahamic religions as filth and one of the gravest sins. In fact, it shakes Gods throne in rage it's so disgusting." <- your opinion again in following a system of belief (not fact).
You might even be right about your system of belief, who knows. But you don't even entertain for a second you could be wrong. And for the record, I entirely agree that I do not want institutions compromised with any form of identitarian politics like sexuality and education of children. But again, the quotes above are not representative of political action so much as prejudice. Not necessarily unfounded prejudice, but a kind of prejudice. Which is not helping anybody.
Most egregious though, is this one to me:
"Your morality is from the education system, mine comes from a higher power." <- almost as if sitting on a high horse, huh? I guarantee you, I've spent far more time in my life actually evaluating, debating, and pondering the nature of morality and god than you seem to think. I'm quite the fan of works of Friederick Nietzsche, Fyodor Dostoyevsky, and Leo Tolstoy, especially in context of the topic of religion.
You assume far too much of everyone, and immediately look down upon me when I haven't even said what I think of gay people, if/and/or what god I believe in, how I treat others, or my politics. You knew none of that, and just assumed you knew it all at the drop of a hat, and can sum it up as "Morality from the education system". In other words, "I am better than you" seems more apt to say.
I can't stand that kind of arrogance.
All you've done is rationalise with yourself. It's not my opinion that the Bible states homosexuality is filth, that's what it states.
It's not my opinion that the US began degenerating rapidly once homosexuality and feminism were accepted. That's a fact.
Their lifestyle is literally the most disease ridden one on earth. They spread filth like wild fire and they account for less than 5% of the population.
You rationalising with yourself isn't going to change reality.
And I really don't care what you think or feel about it. We can easily observe the state of the country and how that lifestyle is at the forefront of the degeneration.
Like I wrote, your morality is from leftist education. Mine is from God. You can call it arrogant as much as you want. It is what it is.
A Pandora's Box is what it is. Whether you realise that's what happened or not is irrelevant.
I wouldn't care one bit if our movement didn't have one homosexual in it. We'd be better off anyway. This is a spiritual movement whether you like it or not.
You'd think by now someone on this site would understand that the DS uses satanic symbolism and involves itself in the occult because it is the inverse of Christian (Jewish and Muslim also) belief.
Homosexuality, feminism and everything that comes with it are part of the occult tool set. I wonder why they never promote the heterosexual traditional family.
Well that's easy. Cause it's healthy and promotes good. Can't use something inherently good to push their cause.
Then I guess we've reached an impasse. I disagree with some of your takes, but I don't want to speak to you as someone lesser than me because I don't view myself as inherently better than anyone else.
Like how I won't try to insult you by belittling your beliefs or morals, unlike how you seem fond with saying things like "Leftist education", as if it were representative of anything I actually thought, which it isn't. Or dismissing a view critical of mine with someone as "Rationalizing with yourself isn't going to change reality", because you think know so much better than everyone else.
I wish you thought the same. I think your God will be very displeased with how you treat others.
All the best, good luck to you.