The rulings of the SCOTUS indeed have been questionable. Depending on which starting point you take to evaluate them and it i simply pack and parcel of the composition of the SCOTUS throughout time.
However, there are some questionable points raised here in her letter.
stacking supreme court with radical dems.
elimination of the filibuster (internal congressional methods)
elections no longer have consequences but ramifications (branching out)
But also, note how she justifies the egregious ways in which supreme court justices of conservative slant have been treated, in this case Justice Thomas.
Intentional language obfuscates facts: long-standing, cherished, deepest-fears, fundamental.
Projection and dissociation: a sinister (= left) prosecutor accessing people data .... (o irony: such truth)
Indeed, it is a worrying idea that people' s rights should be enumerated, but this nervous Nancy is totally silent on the actual constitutional argument: to keep the government in place. She would not like that one bit.
So, under the guise of division (women' s rights) while she is no biologist to even determine what a woman is, she will try to achieve the ultimate goal: that men can also enjoy abortions ....
I guess that will entail cutting something off..... So, her real motive has become clear: she hates real men.
The rulings of the SCOTUS indeed have been questionable. Depending on which starting point you take to evaluate them and it i simply pack and parcel of the composition of the SCOTUS throughout time.
However, there are some questionable points raised here in her letter.
But also, note how she justifies the egregious ways in which supreme court justices of conservative slant have been treated, in this case Justice Thomas.
Intentional language obfuscates facts: long-standing, cherished, deepest-fears, fundamental.
Projection and dissociation: a sinister (= left) prosecutor accessing people data .... (o irony: such truth)
Indeed, it is a worrying idea that people' s rights should be enumerated, but this nervous Nancy is totally silent on the actual constitutional argument: to keep the government in place. She would not like that one bit.
So, under the guise of division (women' s rights) while she is no biologist to even determine what a woman is, she will try to achieve the ultimate goal: that men can also enjoy abortions ....
I guess that will entail cutting something off..... So, her real motive has become clear: she hates real men.