I believe that we have been lied to about so many things, including our diet, that many will be very surprised. Eric Dubay Dr Morse and Charlie Freak will back me up.
There are so many ways to prove "flat earth" is wrong that this is obviously not done to indicate what they truly believe. No flat earth model can possibly explain the math behind aligning a telescope, GPS satellites, or the fact that any large triangle on the earth's surface sums to more than 180 degrees. And I have worked on all of these in real world problems with actual consequences for being wrong. If the earth were flat, I would know. Things break if you try and say 2+2=5.
But anyone who has fallen for this should take this video to heart and consider you are being deceived by freemasons among others. I think they take enjoyment from tricking people in this manner.
all triangles are 180 degrees total. If not, then you don't have a triangle, you have something else. There's your very own 2+2=5 in your own answer. Try again.
If you ask me, all are true, but within their scope.
Some are depicting the Universe, but in ancient times many thought the Earth WAS the Universe. So there was no word for Terra versus Cosmos. They were the same, so when you translate them, assumptions are made and the symbolism falls apart.
WTF did I just watch?! Well, to be fair, I watched about 1.5 minutes of it. Who is the guy drawing on the board? Who is the narrator? Why the insipid music? Oh well, move on, too many other little rabbit holes to avoid.
I believe that we have been lied to about so many things, including our diet, that many will be very surprised. Eric Dubay Dr Morse and Charlie Freak will back me up.
This guy is clearly trolling everyone.
There are so many ways to prove "flat earth" is wrong that this is obviously not done to indicate what they truly believe. No flat earth model can possibly explain the math behind aligning a telescope, GPS satellites, or the fact that any large triangle on the earth's surface sums to more than 180 degrees. And I have worked on all of these in real world problems with actual consequences for being wrong. If the earth were flat, I would know. Things break if you try and say 2+2=5.
But anyone who has fallen for this should take this video to heart and consider you are being deceived by freemasons among others. I think they take enjoyment from tricking people in this manner.
all triangles are 180 degrees total. If not, then you don't have a triangle, you have something else. There's your very own 2+2=5 in your own answer. Try again.
I don't think so. This is just one of many describing the same thing.
Seems to br a form of gnosticism.
Abyssal plains are 40% of the earths crust with less than 1 foot slope. Just sayin.
Also, according to this 'presentation', Polaris would be visible from all of Earth's surface.
Good source to look up too.
Here's a link for those interested.
https://www.sacred-texts.com/atl/ssm/index.htm
I don't think this is meant to be taken literally, but symbolically.
u/sleepydude
What do you think of this video?
It's jumbled together. It does not acknowledge the threefold meaning of all things.
It's taking things too literally
The World =/= the world.
That's the most common misconception in Esoterics, which still throws me off.
He's minced in the nature of the Universe, Solar System, and Earth all in the same illustration.
https://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/boe/index.htm
This text should help make sense of his scribblings.
Personally, I think he took this one and ran with it:
https://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/boe/boe10.htm
If you ask me, all are true, but within their scope.
Some are depicting the Universe, but in ancient times many thought the Earth WAS the Universe. So there was no word for Terra versus Cosmos. They were the same, so when you translate them, assumptions are made and the symbolism falls apart.
Thanks, sleepydude! I knew you'd have the answers.
WTF did I just watch?! Well, to be fair, I watched about 1.5 minutes of it. Who is the guy drawing on the board? Who is the narrator? Why the insipid music? Oh well, move on, too many other little rabbit holes to avoid.