You are correct. This is not about proving that RGB was against abortion rights. Red pilling happens with little crumbs. Right now the army of the left are so indignant that a perfect decision like RvW has been unconstitutionally overturned (according to them) and there is not even an inch of doubt whether the original ruling was perfect.
Show them that inch of doubt. They are finding lot of people to blame, let them start blaming the original RvW ruling which was an overreach.
Let them say "The original ruling should have stuck to the narrow scope and further cases should have added to it, then we would have a solid basis for the ruling. Damn, I cant believe they were so dumb"
You are correct. This is not about proving that RGB was against abortion rights. Red pilling happens with little crumbs. Right now the army of the left are so indignant that a perfect decision like RvW has been unconstitutionally overturned (according to them) and there is not even an inch of doubt whether the original ruling was perfect.
Show them that inch of doubt. They are finding lot of people to blame, let them start blaming the original RvW ruling which was an overreach.
Let them say "The original ruling should have stuck to the narrow scope and further cases should have added to it, then we would have a solid basis for the ruling. Damn, I cant believe they were so dumb"