This lot in Congress are devious. Remember when Diamond & Silk had a spat with Facebook? There was an investigation in Congress and both parties were to testify under oath.
Prior to that session, Zuckerberg decides that he will talk to Congress so he turns up and answers some questions. Come the inquiry, Diamond & Silk turn up but no-one comes from Facebook - bacause Zuckerberg has already atended.
So, Diamond & Silk were interviewed under oath while Facebook was not. Crafty move. It didn't do them any good, though, Diamond & Silk were taking no prisoners!
I have heard that none of these "witnesses" who are "testifying" at the fake J6 hearing ... have been under oath.
Gee, I wonder why that would be.
Can't be charged with perjury. But can be sued for defamation.
This POS thinks she will get a book deal but she will end up where she belongs, lap dancing for food.
This lot in Congress are devious. Remember when Diamond & Silk had a spat with Facebook? There was an investigation in Congress and both parties were to testify under oath.
Prior to that session, Zuckerberg decides that he will talk to Congress so he turns up and answers some questions. Come the inquiry, Diamond & Silk turn up but no-one comes from Facebook - bacause Zuckerberg has already atended.
So, Diamond & Silk were interviewed under oath while Facebook was not. Crafty move. It didn't do them any good, though, Diamond & Silk were taking no prisoners!