If youve been reading Q since Oct 2017, you know what I mean
Edit to clarify--what I mean is there is a Q way of speaking and this lacks it.
Ok eg this stood out immediately: Use your logic
Tell me why this is not Q like
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (253)
sorted by:
We need DJT and this Q do a 0-Delta drop to validate comms. This has not occurred yet. Keep a keen eye on DJTs TRUTH account for this signal
Good point fren. I am not biting until there is more credibility established. When Q went dark, my understanding is that "they" had to go dark because it became compromised. That is why I have reservation that Q would show up now. The so called posts don't sound right. There are too many out there that would love to use Q for a variety of agendas. That has always been the danger. So I am going to wait on the sidelines until I can see what shakes out.
What do you mean compromised? Yes I’m new here. Been reading daily since the election. Please show grace.
Q had a huge target on the back and plenty of resources were expended trying to bring it down. Q moved from 4chan early on to 8chan. When 8chan went down and changed to 8kun CodeMonkey had to fortify the platform. 8chan was down for weeks. When Q came back online there was verification to validate the changed trip code so we knew that it was Q. So far that has not happened with this new appearance. There were several actors gunning for the 8kun platform and when CodeMonkey left it was around the same time Q went dark. I think that is where some of the speculation started that Ron was Q. I knew something was up and ran across some info on some of the farther out areas of the web. There was chatter about a compromise. I didn't understand all the tech speak to know exactly what had happened. So you can take it for what it is worth - or not.
It was a good run while it lasted and Q served to teach many how to do research for themselves. In many ways some of that spirit has been lost and I wish it would come back. Q was never about what the narratives made it out to be. Q at least for me was a pointer towards where to start looking. Anything found along the way was up to the researcher to make up their own mind about. The rest was disinformation to throw the lurkers off. Some made a movement out of Q almost to the point of religious fanaticism. That is where it went off the rails somewhat. For a newbie, some of those Q posts have some great information and data points to jump off from. It is about the research. It might be worth the investment of time if you are new to all of this. That is what anons do because we are the news now. It is not about a social club or a political movement - it is about knowing what the hell is going on in the world so we can do something about it. Happy hunting.
This is a great answer. There is a fine line to draw between fanatics and cultism. However, Q could never be a cult bc it requires critical thinking. I agree, the purpose has been served. Many more are awake. I was unfamiliar with transitioning from 4 Chan to 8 Chan and 8 kun. I knew Ron was suspect in some of this. Thanks for your time and effort explaining.