If youve been reading Q since Oct 2017, you know what I mean
Edit to clarify--what I mean is there is a Q way of speaking and this lacks it.
Ok eg this stood out immediately: Use your logic
Tell me why this is not Q like
If youve been reading Q since Oct 2017, you know what I mean
Edit to clarify--what I mean is there is a Q way of speaking and this lacks it.
Ok eg this stood out immediately: Use your logic
Tell me why this is not Q like
Yup. phrases like: "Use your logic"...Never used by Q. "logical thinking" is seen over 2 dozen times, plus a few "simple logic" or "reconcile using logic", which aptly applies in this case. This is a ploy to divide the Anons.
It still portends big things to come very soon.
Why would the Cabal play the "imposter Q" card unless they're taking fire?
It'd be better to never play that card at all, in my opinion.
I'm 50/50 still. Next week's events might make things a little bit clearer as to who/what this Q is.
Yeah and Im pretty much 50/50 too but def going to looking critically after a year and a half.
I dont put it past them to play a card, stupidly especially after an enormous victory like RvW.
It also could be neither Q nor cabal, but a loony site owner.
I think real Q posted 6/24.
this Q talks like a fag and his shits all retarded
My first wife was 'tarded... she's a pilot now!
Cautiously optimistic, with discerning scrutiny, going forward.
Same....
?
They know time is almost up for them
Options are running low
There are more than two players here. Just because it is not Q does not mean it is the cabal. Some players have interests we may not yet know about. I remain skeptical until clear proofs surface. Do your own research and look in places outside of your usual sources.
It's not black and white. I'm not saying I don't think this is the real Q. I think it's good to be cautious but optimistic. However this could also just be a case of "pay"triots hijacking to make $$$.
it doesn't have to be the cabal that is doing this. It probably is not.
I was reading several messages earlier on 8kun where some autists believe the guys that did this were banned from qresearch for good 6 months ago, and one of them is an old board op. I didn't see any of this at the time - wasn't paying attention - so if I get the details mixed up I did the best I could. I believe they said this is the whole babyfist thing where he posted on Q's private board, and got banned. Now he is butthurt and is acting like Q is posting (with Jim's help).
I don't know if this is the answer or not - it's just what I read earlier.
Maybe as a lab experiment to see how we react. There are academic well funded groups watching us here I am almost certain. They are studying what kind of post are made, and what the reaction to them is. All of this is being done so they can learn how to manipulate us
If you don't believe this, just look at what they did with the voat dataset, here, and what their conclusions were.
Look at section: 8 Conclusion
Notice that elsewhere there are references to reddit, and 4chan.
Is the Cabal the only entity with a justifiable interest in manipulating Q supporters and the capability of doing so through the chan?
Not everybody with hostile intentions are on the same side against you. Just like how not every sympathetic voice is necessarily “on your side.” The world is far more complicated than that.
It would take a lot of resources for someone to hijack the tripcodes.
I'm outright dismissing any which don't bear the original tripcode at the moment, as everyone should until further verification. The TOR posts should be ignored until proven otherwise.
This is not the first time they've attempted to dupe us with fake Q posts, but it is the first where there has been monkeying with the tripcode salt.
Q is posting on 8kun. 4Chan effectively kicked him off when the mods refused to provide tripcode protections. Selection of mods was thought to be more secure on 8kun
I never made that claim.
Consider the landscape. If this was just like any other fake Q, why the media coverage? This time is different because it caused the MSM to expend resources to announce Q's supposed return with mainstream articles.
https://www.google.com/search?q=q+returns&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjopKjJsNP4AhWyQzABHWj2DdkQ_AUoAXoECAEQAw&biw=1920&bih=955&dpr=1
The Cabal, specifically, have proven a financial interest in promoting these Q posts.
So, yes... There is hostile intent behind these posts from the same group of people behind all MSM outlets. That's the Cabal I'm referring to -- the same 6 companies behind all National media outlets.
It would take a lot of resources for some people. Not everyone.
I can’t imagine why anyone would think that. Moderator selection is as simple as clicking a button. There is no formal process for moderator applications beyond what the site administrator has decided.
So Q and Q supporters trusted Watkins to provide moderator protection worthy of something as important as the Plan? Why? Who on earth would trust him for such an important task?
Are chans really too difficult for the Q Team to have set up their own, that they fully controlled and secured? We wouldn’t be dealing with this problem right now if Q wasn’t relying on the 8chan administrator as his gatekeeper.
I’ve discussed this before. The outside world, the media, and so forth are not concerned about Q or his predictions. Very few people from the outside even know what those predictions are.
The outside world keeps an eye on Q people because they worry what happens when the Plan fails to come to fruition.
Lie or not, Q-adjacent beliefs are considered partly to blame for Jan 6th by the outside world. Everyone knows what the “ammo box” is.
If the Q team never shows up to execute all these alleged pedophilic Satanist cannibals, do Q people give up and consider that maybe they were misled, and that these politicians, while despicable, may not be responsible for what Q and Trump suggested?
If not, then THAT is why the media is going to breathlessly report on the Q movement, rather than Q’s words. Because Q’s words are less important to the outside world than the actions and influence of the people who believe the story he told.
"This is a play to divide the anons".
And you are playing your part.
Btw the phrase is anons. The term " the anons" is NEVER used by actual anons.
👌👊
My take is the term “the anons” imply a someone from outside the anon community.
I dont think Dragon was playing a role in dividing, whatsoever, neither am I, or really anyone much from this discussion.
We can have differing opinions on our caution level of returning Q posts as we see what time tells, and still be united overall. Why be rude
I said ploy, not play. Also, pointing out it is a ploy does not make it less true, even if it does seem to make me a de facto participant. However my aim is not to divide but to unite, and calmly discussing differences of opinions does just that. Should I just stay silent so as to not "rock the boat"?. I believe this movement is mature enough to withstand healthy debates.
I dont think your comment was divisive. And IF there was trickery going on, any Q posing, actually it prob would be a ploy to divide and cause trouble.
Don't let some suspicious and judgmentall woman who likes to attack the anons bother you.
SHE is the one who is divisive.
Usually, people refer to anons with no article.
But a comment and a commenter don't become "divisive" FFS, just because of placing the article "the" before anons. What complete nonsense.
Cf. "the white hats," "the patriots", the Republicans, etc.
/werdnerd
Why bother with arguing? You’re better off cataloguing all u/usernames attacking you without reasonable discourse in a notepad.
Amen anon
touche
We need DJT and this Q do a 0-Delta drop to validate comms. This has not occurred yet. Keep a keen eye on DJTs TRUTH account for this signal
Good point fren. I am not biting until there is more credibility established. When Q went dark, my understanding is that "they" had to go dark because it became compromised. That is why I have reservation that Q would show up now. The so called posts don't sound right. There are too many out there that would love to use Q for a variety of agendas. That has always been the danger. So I am going to wait on the sidelines until I can see what shakes out.
What do you mean compromised? Yes I’m new here. Been reading daily since the election. Please show grace.
Q had a huge target on the back and plenty of resources were expended trying to bring it down. Q moved from 4chan early on to 8chan. When 8chan went down and changed to 8kun CodeMonkey had to fortify the platform. 8chan was down for weeks. When Q came back online there was verification to validate the changed trip code so we knew that it was Q. So far that has not happened with this new appearance. There were several actors gunning for the 8kun platform and when CodeMonkey left it was around the same time Q went dark. I think that is where some of the speculation started that Ron was Q. I knew something was up and ran across some info on some of the farther out areas of the web. There was chatter about a compromise. I didn't understand all the tech speak to know exactly what had happened. So you can take it for what it is worth - or not.
It was a good run while it lasted and Q served to teach many how to do research for themselves. In many ways some of that spirit has been lost and I wish it would come back. Q was never about what the narratives made it out to be. Q at least for me was a pointer towards where to start looking. Anything found along the way was up to the researcher to make up their own mind about. The rest was disinformation to throw the lurkers off. Some made a movement out of Q almost to the point of religious fanaticism. That is where it went off the rails somewhat. For a newbie, some of those Q posts have some great information and data points to jump off from. It is about the research. It might be worth the investment of time if you are new to all of this. That is what anons do because we are the news now. It is not about a social club or a political movement - it is about knowing what the hell is going on in the world so we can do something about it. Happy hunting.
exactly
Obligatory reminder that Q != a single person. Therefore, expect writing styles to differ.
Q Post 15, Oct 31 2017 (aka not long before Al-Waleed aka +++ is taken out)
It has been agreed upon in retrospect that this Q post was written by Saudi Arabian Patriots. Wizards and Warlocks is a Comms term involving SA that goes back to the 80s, and the Satanic Evil POS is obvious given the Nov 2017 events.
Background on the 80s Saudi usage of Wizards/Warlocks?
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/08/29/the-greatest-american-hero-wizards-and-warlocks/#Wizardsw
I never put this together but I wonder if that post was written by Kash?
He wrote himself into his book as a wizard...
Yes. Logic shouldn't be subjective. Heck, I dropped out of a Philosophy class after 30 min when they started that syllogism stuff where sentences are broken into parts.
Yep, it's almost as if the fake Q and the shills here are coordinating to break trust.
Q isn't just one person, it's a team of people. Maybe I'm just being optimistic but it could be someone else from the team now writing these drops.
“First, in your sermons, use your logic, and then your rhetoric; Rhetoric without logic, is like a tree with leaves and blossoms, but no root; yet more are taken with rhetoric than logic, because they are caught with fine expressions when they understand not reason.” — John Selden Featured in: John Selden Quotes
You do realize Q isnt just 1 person
He/ they have also been absent for 18 months….maybe that’s the reason for a change in style?
"Logic" in of itself is not possessive. Logic exists absolute.
If a drop a ball, logic dictates it will hit the floor. No one owns a different set of logic, that's delusion.
So this Q is using wordplay to get us to be possessive of the Q perspective.
My question is what are these latest fake drops being added to QAlerts site. At least some notation should be added that cast some doubt on there authenticity.
Compare the following posts;
Post 4958
Post 1974
Post 1316
Post 1291
Frankly, every post that says “Trust the Plan” reads vastly different from the new one.
https://qagg.news/?q=Trust+the+plan
It’s possible Q came back, then the trip was highjacked.