If youve been reading Q since Oct 2017, you know what I mean
Edit to clarify--what I mean is there is a Q way of speaking and this lacks it.
Ok eg this stood out immediately: Use your logic
Tell me why this is not Q like
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (253)
sorted by:
Yup. phrases like: "Use your logic"...Never used by Q. "logical thinking" is seen over 2 dozen times, plus a few "simple logic" or "reconcile using logic", which aptly applies in this case. This is a ploy to divide the Anons.
It still portends big things to come very soon.
Why would the Cabal play the "imposter Q" card unless they're taking fire?
It'd be better to never play that card at all, in my opinion.
I'm 50/50 still. Next week's events might make things a little bit clearer as to who/what this Q is.
Yeah and Im pretty much 50/50 too but def going to looking critically after a year and a half.
I dont put it past them to play a card, stupidly especially after an enormous victory like RvW.
It also could be neither Q nor cabal, but a loony site owner.
I think real Q posted 6/24.
this Q talks like a fag and his shits all retarded
My first wife was 'tarded... she's a pilot now!
Cautiously optimistic, with discerning scrutiny, going forward.
Same....
They know time is almost up for them
Options are running low
There are more than two players here. Just because it is not Q does not mean it is the cabal. Some players have interests we may not yet know about. I remain skeptical until clear proofs surface. Do your own research and look in places outside of your usual sources.
It's not black and white. I'm not saying I don't think this is the real Q. I think it's good to be cautious but optimistic. However this could also just be a case of "pay"triots hijacking to make $$$.
"This is a play to divide the anons".
And you are playing your part.
Btw the phrase is anons. The term " the anons" is NEVER used by actual anons.
👌👊
My take is the term “the anons” imply a someone from outside the anon community.
I dont think Dragon was playing a role in dividing, whatsoever, neither am I, or really anyone much from this discussion.
We can have differing opinions on our caution level of returning Q posts as we see what time tells, and still be united overall. Why be rude
I said ploy, not play. Also, pointing out it is a ploy does not make it less true, even if it does seem to make me a de facto participant. However my aim is not to divide but to unite, and calmly discussing differences of opinions does just that. Should I just stay silent so as to not "rock the boat"?. I believe this movement is mature enough to withstand healthy debates.
I dont think your comment was divisive. And IF there was trickery going on, any Q posing, actually it prob would be a ploy to divide and cause trouble.
Don't let some suspicious and judgmentall woman who likes to attack the anons bother you.
SHE is the one who is divisive.
Usually, people refer to anons with no article.
But a comment and a commenter don't become "divisive" FFS, just because of placing the article "the" before anons. What complete nonsense.
Cf. "the white hats," "the patriots", the Republicans, etc.
/werdnerd
Why bother with arguing? You’re better off cataloguing all u/usernames attacking you without reasonable discourse in a notepad.
Amen anon
touche
We need DJT and this Q do a 0-Delta drop to validate comms. This has not occurred yet. Keep a keen eye on DJTs TRUTH account for this signal
Good point fren. I am not biting until there is more credibility established. When Q went dark, my understanding is that "they" had to go dark because it became compromised. That is why I have reservation that Q would show up now. The so called posts don't sound right. There are too many out there that would love to use Q for a variety of agendas. That has always been the danger. So I am going to wait on the sidelines until I can see what shakes out.
What do you mean compromised? Yes I’m new here. Been reading daily since the election. Please show grace.
Q had a huge target on the back and plenty of resources were expended trying to bring it down. Q moved from 4chan early on to 8chan. When 8chan went down and changed to 8kun CodeMonkey had to fortify the platform. 8chan was down for weeks. When Q came back online there was verification to validate the changed trip code so we knew that it was Q. So far that has not happened with this new appearance. There were several actors gunning for the 8kun platform and when CodeMonkey left it was around the same time Q went dark. I think that is where some of the speculation started that Ron was Q. I knew something was up and ran across some info on some of the farther out areas of the web. There was chatter about a compromise. I didn't understand all the tech speak to know exactly what had happened. So you can take it for what it is worth - or not.
It was a good run while it lasted and Q served to teach many how to do research for themselves. In many ways some of that spirit has been lost and I wish it would come back. Q was never about what the narratives made it out to be. Q at least for me was a pointer towards where to start looking. Anything found along the way was up to the researcher to make up their own mind about. The rest was disinformation to throw the lurkers off. Some made a movement out of Q almost to the point of religious fanaticism. That is where it went off the rails somewhat. For a newbie, some of those Q posts have some great information and data points to jump off from. It is about the research. It might be worth the investment of time if you are new to all of this. That is what anons do because we are the news now. It is not about a social club or a political movement - it is about knowing what the hell is going on in the world so we can do something about it. Happy hunting.
exactly
Obligatory reminder that Q != a single person. Therefore, expect writing styles to differ.
Q Post 15, Oct 31 2017 (aka not long before Al-Waleed aka +++ is taken out)
It has been agreed upon in retrospect that this Q post was written by Saudi Arabian Patriots. Wizards and Warlocks is a Comms term involving SA that goes back to the 80s, and the Satanic Evil POS is obvious given the Nov 2017 events.
Background on the 80s Saudi usage of Wizards/Warlocks?
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/08/29/the-greatest-american-hero-wizards-and-warlocks/#Wizardsw
I never put this together but I wonder if that post was written by Kash?
He wrote himself into his book as a wizard...